Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

I prefer the theory that the coastal landmass SUNK, rather than the “sea level rise” theory.


15 posted on 08/17/2015 8:57:52 AM PDT by G Larry (Obama is replicating the instruments of the fall of Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry

There had to be some sea level fluctuation during and after the ice age. Water is a zero sum game. If it’s covering land masses hundreds of feet thick over hundreds or thousands of miles, the sea levels must be lower while that’s going on. After those ice sheets melt, sea levels must rise. Unless I’m missing something.


17 posted on 08/17/2015 9:11:42 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

The Mediterranean Sea notably outlets over a narrow & shallow ridge. Entirely possible that the ridge was once high enough to hold back the ocean, protecting a vast valley behind - and, to the article’s subject, left a dry space where ambitious early humans moved* a large stone to its current location. Subsequently the ridge eroded over a long(!) period, giving way to the relentless ocean and flooding the area, leaving aforementioned rock 140’ below sea level.

* - my father was long fond of the expression “brute force and ignorance gets the job done.”


20 posted on 08/17/2015 9:16:21 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson