To: NRx
The decision’s logic, he said, endangered all sorts of laws, including ones that regulate misleading advertising and professional malpractice. The article's hysteria misses the point. The ruling vacates regulations prohibiting speech, but does not absolve the speaker of consequences thereof.
11 posted on
08/17/2015 11:24:28 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
(The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
To: ctdonath2
The NYT, and others of similar ilk, is all for THEIR free speech, but no one else.
12 posted on
08/17/2015 11:29:31 AM PDT by
abb
("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson