Sorry! Since you are the expert then take the time to educate and us under which laws you base your disagreements. Here is a better one for you. Listen to the Levin show and systematically refute everything he says or what you do not agree with. Are you willing to take that level of effort? That would be very helpful and very useful.
That would be an excellent start and you would all educate on just how much you know and it would attest to your credibility.
When I listen to Levin or Hugh Hewitt what I like about them is that they discuss the law and how it applies. If you want to establish yourself as the expert you’ll have to work for it. Listen to Levin and show how you disagree and why and under what laws.
I would love that!
That would be useful.
The rest is totally BS!
You want me to listen to the entire segment again, and refute it point by point? It’s not really worth my time to do that, and I really have no interest in trying to refute Levin—don’t get me wrong, I generally agree with Levin on most issues, he’s a smart lawyer and an astute observer. I just happen to disagree with a couple of the individual points he made, and I cited the Constitutional language that forms the basis of my disagreement.