Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
The growth of benefits for people with high lifetime earnings could instead be moderated.

That is already done.

Besides, no discussion of SS is complete without the realization that the SS Trust Fund is a fiction; SS is a cash flow program commingled with general funds. Whether there's bookkeeping entries one way or the other to the Trust Fund is irrelevant to the finances of the country, although not the politics.

2 posted on 08/21/2015 9:44:45 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine

RE: Besides, no discussion of SS is complete without the realization that the SS Trust Fund is a fiction

Al Gore did that, and was laughed out of town with his repeated mention of the LOCK BOX.


4 posted on 08/21/2015 9:47:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Social Security would be best cut off for those 55 or below. Best of all would be simply giving a one year grace period then ending the whole program altogether along with ending government connections of all types with medicine and insurance, ALL types other than weights and measures (explicit in the Constitution) and truth in advertising (implied by the previous) and sanctity of contract.


12 posted on 08/21/2015 10:01:52 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

when America was growing and needed people—maybe that was OK—remember the law was put in to help Blacks Freed slavery. Now the USA is one of the only nations that does this. If we ended welfare and free junk—people wouldn’t flood in. We are being played for suckers. Trump sees it—now others are. If your an illegal—you get no free junk—no citizenship—no free food, education health care etc. i don’t blame people from the 3rd world from coming here—I would (just as my people came from an occupied and ensalved Ireland long ago). We just can’t afford it now.


36 posted on 08/21/2015 10:39:06 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

You are correct. A retiree with a low average indexed monthly earning (AIME) gets 90% of his monthly income. The next group gets 90% of the low amount and 32% of the next higher set of AIME. The highest earners get the same but only 15% of their highest covered earnings. What the Bolsheviks want to do is deny SS retirement coverage for the high earners.


45 posted on 08/21/2015 11:27:43 AM PDT by rcofdayton (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine
"The growth of benefits for people with high lifetime earnings could instead be moderated. That is already done."

Amen. I already lost half of what I put into SS in order to get my teacher retirement pension, of which I contributed half.

52 posted on 08/21/2015 12:25:34 PM PDT by scottiemom (As a retired Texas public school teacher, I highly recommend private school)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine
I would vote against anyone who thinks that its OK to reduce my social security benefits after I have paid into it all of my life.

Not paying what is promised is theft plain and simple.

58 posted on 08/21/2015 3:46:14 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson