Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww
And ‘a woman’s right to choose’ what she does with her body is made at the time she engages in the sexual act. She does NOT have the right to take the life of the child as a means of declaring she has ‘a right to murder’ her children.......

Precisely and if she did, why should she need to do it on a schedule? If killing the child is the woman's "choice" she should be allowed to kill it at any time and for any reason until it reaches adulthood, saying she can only kill it through birth seems rather arbitrary.

77 posted on 08/24/2015 12:38:10 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

Woman know all to well it’s a baby......just because the child is not wanted does not change the fact it’s still murdering their child.....

Even those who butcher and divide baby parts for selling say...”It’s a boy”....it’s a baby”.....and they call the parts by human names...from heart, to legs etc.


78 posted on 08/24/2015 12:48:17 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson