Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Radical; stevie_d_64

Saddam sent *parts* and the missiles he used couldn’t launch from their containers.

Basically, this *is* new. It lets any container ship become an ersatz missile site without any other modifications. Given the state of port security, this means *any* modern freighter can be a Q-ship with no detectable external modifications.

And Russia is now very interested in selling them to anyone with the cash to buy them.

Imagine a third-nation-flagged container freighter with these on board as the top layer of their load sailing into NY or LA harbor, mooring up and then immediately launching these missiles. Let’s figure it’s got 100 containers on its top layer, all missile boxes. Each launcher has four missiles and conservatively could fire one every six seconds. That’s four hundred cruise missiles and ship killers being unleashed in the heart of one of the busiest ports and business districts in the world. Even conventionally armed, they could do a LOT of damage.


4 posted on 08/26/2015 2:03:57 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

Yep, saw the picture with the system integrated into that container...

No Bueno...

Some population center is going to have a very bad day...

The ONLY reason you put a weapons system into a container like this IS to be able to sneek in closer and polish off something before your enemy has time to do anything about it...


11 posted on 08/27/2015 2:19:48 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I will settle for a "perfectly good, gently used" kidney...Apply within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson