since you have not denied it.
Denied WHAT?
humblegunner,
Firstly, you posted a series of words that was mocking to the idea that killing unborn of research and production of some vaccines or other medicines/products is wrong/evil. Mocking by giving the impression that we’ll just do without medications and embrace disease without using destroyed unborn in research.
Secondly, as offensive as the above idea is, one would hope that it was sarcastic in nature. No sarc tag was given, nor was any indication given by you that sarcasm was intended. This leads one to believe you were speaking as you truly feel.
That led to my first post to you, leading to now.
Mea culpa on the self-post. I posted from the Pings page, not considering I would be posting to myself. Lessons learned from abnormal events.
The vast majority of all I have seen or read from you, including all your blog-police items, I agree with. Your initial post on this thread was morally indefensible. I still hope there was a sarc or satire element to what you had to say. Lacking that, you are on amoral shifting sand. There is NO defensible position for abortion, much less carving up the remains and selling it for research.