Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raytheon looks to add Army air-defense role to Sidewinder
Arizona Daily Star ^ | August 26, 2015 | David Wichner

Posted on 08/28/2015 5:05:43 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

The Army and Tucson-based Raytheon Missile Systems have test-fired the latest version of the company’s venerable Sidewinder air-to-air missile from a ground launcher to down an unmanned aircraft target, the company said Wednesday.

WHAT HAPPENED

Raytheon said that an AIM-9X Block II Sidewinder missile was launched from a prototype Multi-Mission Launcher, a new ground-based launch system under development by the Army. The test was performed in March at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, and details were announced by the company Wednesday.

The AIM-9X missile locked onto an unmanned aircraft before launch and then intercepted and destroyed the drone, which was flying 1,500 meters above ground level.

WHY IT’S SIGNIFICANT

The supersonic, heat-seeking Sidewinder is normally fired from aircraft at aerial targets, and Raytheon said the test demonstrated that the latest AIM-9X variant can also be used without modification for ground-based air defense.

Originally developed for the Navy in the 1950s, the Sidewinder has been fielded by more than 30 allied nations and was first used by U.S. fighters during the Vietnam War. Eighteen nations currently field the AIM-9X, which Raytheon has been making for 14 years. The Block II version, declared operationally ready in March, adds a datalink to direct the missile to its target in mid-flight.

WHAT’S A MULTI-MISSION LAUNCHER?

Pause Current Time 0:00 / Duration Time 0:00 Loaded: 0%Progress: 0%0:00 Fullscreen 00:00 Unmute As its name suggests, the Multi-Mission Launcher is designed to fire a variety of missile types. In the same test with the AIM-9X, the launcher fired another missile carrying an Army-developed “low-cost active seeker,” as well as a Miniature Hit-to-Kill vehicle — designed to destroy its targets by sheer impact — made by Lockheed Martin. Both successfully flew planned non-intercept flights, the Army said.

The launcher is designed to provide 360-degree protection while firing at multiple targets at the same time. Besides unmanned aircraft, potential targets include cruise missiles, rockets, artillery and mortars.

WHAT’S NEXT?

The Army plans to continue testing and expects the launcher to be ready for service by 2019. Raytheon said it expects the Sidewinder to be a main weapon used with the launcher.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; raytheon; sam; sidewinder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: GreyFriar

Thanks for the ping and the link. It makes sense to update this old system.


21 posted on 08/28/2015 8:44:49 AM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
I worked at the Air Defense Board in the early 80s. One of the things I noticed right off the bat was the previous five Board Presidents went to work for Raytheon shortly after retiring from active duty.

I found the “reunions” at testing sites to be quite nauseating.

Somebody should have gone to jail over the money wasted on SGT York. I read the test results.


Wasn't the Sgt. York (DIVAD) a Ford screw-up?

22 posted on 08/28/2015 9:44:12 AM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: az_gila

You are correct. IIRC, DIVAD was a major system under Pentagon oversight. The AD Board at Ft. Bliss tested lower profile weapons systems.


23 posted on 08/28/2015 9:59:40 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi! My vote is going to Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

Nothing new here.

I was one of the original instructors who taught the Chaparral Missile System at Ft. Bliss from 1968-1970.
Also developed the lesson plans, tests, etc.

One of my associates, whom I assisted, taught the Redeye shoulder-fired IR missile system.

Lots of good memories.


24 posted on 08/28/2015 10:02:32 AM PDT by rinf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
You are correct. IIRC, DIVAD was a major system under Pentagon oversight. The AD Board at Ft. Bliss tested lower profile weapons systems.


Just for clarity for other readers....

The “Ford” screw-up I referred to was “Ford Aerospace” a division of Ford Motor Co., not President Ford...:^)

25 posted on 08/28/2015 10:47:37 AM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rinf

ADA OBC and the Chap/Vulcan Course in 1986. So long ago...


26 posted on 08/28/2015 10:25:44 PM PDT by Thunder 6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson