Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HKMk23
Yes, but the “marriage licenses” she has the official duty to issue are Kentucky marriage licenses, NOT Federal marriage licenses, and Kentucky marriage licenses do not apply to — and, therefore, it is ludicrous to issue them to — same-sex couples.

That's why I think the most effective approach here would be for states to get out of the business of issuing marriage licenses entirely.

Who the hell is anyone in a state government to insist on "licensing" a marriage, in the first place?

234 posted on 09/02/2015 4:18:29 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
That's why I think the most effective approach here would be for states to get out of the business of issuing marriage licenses entirely.

I regard that as a defeat for society and for reason, but at this point it looks like the best we can do is a strategic retreat until we can find some more power some where.

It is my understanding that Oklahoma has changed their law to do away with marriage certificates. To effectively remove any state involvement in the process. They did this specifically with the intent to prevent any Faggot Marriage licenses from being issued, and to prevent any clerks from having to deal with the issue.

Kentucky should do the same. The message needs to be sent to the court that they didn't win, they just destroyed legal marriage for everyone else.

242 posted on 09/02/2015 6:36:10 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson