Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Reader_David
Odd, I thought the Federal judicial code no longer allows for writs of mandamus, yet the article asserts the SCOTUS issued an order for her to perform a duty, which is a writ of mandamus, even if not so called.

The Supreme Court did nothing except deny a stay. The district judge issued an injunction. (And yes, writs of mandamus are still used in the federal courts, but generally only by the appellate courts.)

31 posted on 09/02/2015 8:31:34 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

Then the article wrongly asserts that the Supreme Court issued an order.


70 posted on 09/03/2015 4:52:51 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson