There is no difference between this woman & the Muslim airline Stewardess that wouldn’t serve booze on the flight to customers.
Cruz voted for the Corker bill and TPA. This gave Obama power to get the Iran deal. He and the other Republucans (with exception of Cotton, who voted no on Corker) did more damage with that vote, than the supremes did on the gay marriage vote.
The Iran deal compromised the Constitution & will cost lives.
Actually, there is a great deal of difference between the two. The stewardess works for the airline, and she is refusing to follow the policies and procedures of her employer, which existed and were clear to her before taking the job. Her employer has the right to fire her if no reasonable accommodation can be made.
The clerk works for the people of her county. She was elected to office by them, which is why she cannot be fired. The people of Kentucky voted overwhelmingly to keep marriage between a man and a woman only. So in her actions, she is fulfilling the policies and procedures approved by her "employers" at the time she was "hired". Those policies and procedures have not been changed by her employers (the voters); instead, the changes have been imposed by federal courts.
So you may disagree with the clerk's decision, but to compare her to the Muslim stewardess is an example of very faulty reasoning.
Says the election period concern troll who posted in 2004, then disappeared until November of 2012 to pop up and wail that we were going to lose.
And who took another long break until late in 2014, when you showed up just SO enthusiastic about Ted Cruz. But of course, it didn’t take you long for “concerns” to set in about him, either.
If you’re under thirty, I’ll give you a pass. You still have a lot to learn.