Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rochester

On the other hand I have always believed sperm banks are immoral.How is it anything but commercialized adultery?re some will say”but what about childless couples?”
Doesn’t change the FACT that a third party is being introduced into the marriage.


13 posted on 09/04/2015 6:19:01 AM PDT by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hoosierham; rochester
Gotta agree with you, hoosierham. In marriage, you give the whole of your sexuality over to your spouse. It's really not ligitmate to take the real heart and soul of sexuality --- procreation --- and outsource it to somebody else. Because of the innately exclusive nature of marriage, it entails an implicit agreement to conceive/beget children only with your spouse.

The particular case shows how a baby, supposed to be the gift of love, turns into a commodity, begotten as part of a commercial transaction. The child is not valued for the child's own sake, but his/her worth is entirely subordinate to customer (adult) satisfaction.

44 posted on 01/27/2018 2:55:04 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("I ain't denyin' the women are foolish. The Good Lord made 'em to match the men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson