SCOTUS ruled that gays have a constitutional right to marry. We all think that was overreach. But the constitution gives the judicial branch that authority to make that ruling.
So we need to impeach those justicies, But in the meantime gay marriage is the law of the land.
A judge in light of the SCOTUS ruling specifically orderd her to issue the licenses. She disobeyed the judges order. The judge has the legal right to hold her in contempt of court which he did.
In truth, the laws are a mess because of the Supreme court ruling. Kentucky laws are clearly written for a man and a woman to be married not this abomination that SCOTUS has favored.
RE: But the constitution gives the judicial branch that authority to make that ruling.
So, when the Justices decided in the Dredd Scott decision, that there is a “right” for whites to own blacks, that is the end of the argument and it should be the law of the land?
Is that what the framers intended.