Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clintons personally paid State Department staffer to maintain server
WashingtonPost.com ^ | 9/4/15 | Rosalind S. Helderman and Carol D. Leonnig

Posted on 09/04/2015 8:22:48 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Bobby_Taxpayer

Don’t forget if this was a government IT pro he/she must have known secret/confidential government protocol and purposely set up a sever to bypass it.


41 posted on 09/05/2015 4:31:04 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
" I dread what these people have behind door number 3."

Door Number 3:


42 posted on 09/05/2015 4:40:45 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Is this the latest way a Clinton employee figured out how to get multiple paychecks for working different jobs simultaneously? Just when you thought Democrap leeches couldn’t figure out a new way to game the system.


43 posted on 09/05/2015 4:43:20 AM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Some basic questions the press should ask:

- Why did we learn about Mr. Pagliano so late in this discussion?

- Was the Dept of State aware of Mr. Pagliano’s activities?

- Why did Mr. Pagliano hide his income from this job?

- What are Mr. Pagliano’s qualifications for this job?

- What is Mr. Pagliano’s security clearance level?

- Why did you not provide a W2 or 1099 for Mr. Pagliano?

- Please show us the cancelled checks or transfer notices for the payments to Mr. Pagliano?

- How did Mr. Pagliano interface with the private firm managing the server?

...And so on. The questions write themselves.


44 posted on 09/05/2015 5:25:04 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma
Don’t forget if this was a government IT pro he/she must have known secret/confidential government protocol and purposely set up a sever to bypass it.

Can't happen. Unclassified PCs and servers are connected to different networks. Say for instance that even if he did, it would be illegal. I don't think a government IT pro would even contemplate trying a around, no matter how much his criminal boss tried to pay him.

45 posted on 09/05/2015 5:52:34 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Exactly. If Bill Clinton took a tax deduction for donating his used underwear, there is no way they paid for this personally. This was paid for by the Clinton Foundation. Somebody subpoena the paychecks.


46 posted on 09/05/2015 5:59:41 AM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bobby_Taxpayer

You seem to know about government IT stuff so I’ll ask

Back during the Bengazi affair I seem to remember Hillary using the word “cable”. that would be an archaic term for a telex or similar message that somehow made it into the age of the email. in my mind, the telex was replaced by the fax that was pretty much replaced by e mail.

one wonders if cables in the form of coded telex messages still exist in the State Department for very sensitive correspondence or if routine highly classified e mails are encrypted.

my thought is that Hillary just couldn’t be bothered with routine encryption and bypassed it and eventually may have just disregarded encryption at all.


47 posted on 09/05/2015 6:15:42 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, .. Iran deal & holocaust: Obama's batting clean up for Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bert

A cable, I think is still being used in State adept terms, as “official” correspondence through official chAnnels. There used to be a system in DOD for messages just like in DOS, but now a days I think it is all email, just through official email addresses. By the way, a “cable” would also be written clearly and consisly, for formal than a standard email.


48 posted on 09/05/2015 6:25:47 AM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

The alternative media needs to be all over this story.


49 posted on 09/05/2015 7:44:16 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Yep, I’ve been saying it for a long while now that Michelle would be the Dem nominee. The only question is would Barack allow her to upstage him? He won’t be getting all the glory anymore.


50 posted on 09/05/2015 8:19:43 AM PDT by tenger (Trump vs. Sanders would certainly be entertaining)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tenger
I’ve been saying it for a long while now that Michelle would be the Dem nominee.

She's 200:1 on the Euro wagering sites.

If you really believe that, head on over and lay down some dough, those are awesome odds, almost like free money.

51 posted on 09/05/2015 8:24:30 AM PDT by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: This_far; All; Rebelbase; Nachum; SJackson
It would be equally entertaining to have all media & pundits be required to reveal their political affiliations, contributions etc

(demise of the dem/lib party much?)

Nah. 45% of the “journo lists” now identify themselves as “independents” (ie, communists and socialists) already.

Another 40% proudly DO identify themselves as democrats.

There are, as I recall, only 6% that claim even (luke-warm establishment liberal) republican (GROPe) voters like George Will.

52 posted on 09/05/2015 8:26:54 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
just trying to save the taxpayers a few pennies, how thoughtful... bless her black heart
53 posted on 09/05/2015 9:52:54 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
There is NO WAY IN HADES that Hillary “paid” ANYBODY from her own money.

If the Clinton Foundation paid this idiot, it opens the door to a forensic audit of that suspect enterprise.

Oh please Oh please Oh please Oh please.

54 posted on 09/05/2015 10:20:59 AM PDT by IncPen (Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
Door Number 3: Mook-chelle

Yeah, as frightening as it is, I just don't see it. She's even less qualified than him (or Faux-cahontas). And even less likable– she's brittle and shrill; she makes Hillary look cuddly.

55 posted on 09/05/2015 10:23:14 AM PDT by IncPen (Not one single patriot in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bobby_Taxpayer

I meant setting up Hillary’s stand alone system to bypass security directives not internal server protocols.


56 posted on 09/05/2015 2:52:40 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson