Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WENDLE
FWIW, contempt of court is a coercive tool. Once it becomes clear that coercion will not result in the clerk issuing licenses to homos, the court is supposed to (to preserve its legitimacy) cease incarceration.

It's a battle of wills, but the court can't hold you for life for adhering to your conscience, when your conscientious actions do no harm.

5 posted on 09/07/2015 7:41:15 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

They just need a Habeas Corpus. It is over. That judge had no authority over a sovereign elected official. ZERO. Those queer “licenses” are not worth squat!!Huge mistake for judge. It will be fun to watch. She wins EASY!!


8 posted on 09/07/2015 7:46:11 PM PDT by WENDLE (How did Hillary get Top Secret docs out of the Dedicated Secure Network facility?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

Yeah, but the Gaystapo claims she IS harming them.
Huh. Not giving them the piece of paper they’re demanding is somehow preventing butt sex?
Which equals harm?
In fact, not having the paper in no way prevents them from fornicating, while obtaining it in no way uplifts the nature of what they do.
Remember when some people claimed they didn’t need a silly piece of paper to prove their love?
Ironic. SMH.


25 posted on 09/07/2015 10:29:13 PM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the future; brother it is murder. -L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson