And Andrea isn't?
Posted on 09/11/2015 8:37:02 AM PDT by JohnKinAK
More FOX News Controlled Opposition – This Time Its Andrea Tantaros Ripping Kim Davis & Pushing Nuremberg-Style Rhetoric
FOX News needs some people who actually have read the Constitution and know what it says. They also need some people who actually know what they are talking about. Andrea Tantaros is the latest FOX personality to demonstrate the news outlet is controlled opposition as she blasted Kim Davis for setting a "dangerous precedent" for doing what the law commands.
Appearing on The O'Reilly Factor on Wednesday evening, Tantaros told host Bill O'Reilly, "The problem is she's essential rewriting the laws of that county by not issuing [licenses]. As a Christian I do feel sorry for her and I'm sympathetic to her beliefs, however she doesn't have a legal leg to stand on."
She claimed that Davis cannot decide to not enforce law simply because she believes it's wrong.
"It sets a dangerous precedent," Tantaros continued. "A woman with Sharia not issuing drivers licenses to women, because she doesn't believe she can drive, or say somebody who says, 'I don't believe in the Second Amendment so I'm not going to give gun permits.'"
Wow! She just pulled a Shepard Smith and brought Sharia into the picture! Amazing! It's not even a good contrast since Davis actually upheld law and the Muslim woman was not doing that.
Well, let's see, Andrea is using the same kind of ridiculous arguments that the Nazis employed at Nuremberg. She wants Kim Davis to follow unlawful orders from a Bush-appointed, sodomite endorsing judge rather than follow the law. How many times do these people fail to cite the law? They claim law and claim Davis is breaking it and that she is attempting to rewrite it, but is she? Absolutely not!
I've cited Kentucky law, which is the only law that matters. It is the mantra that attorney Michael Peroutka chanted at the rally on Saturday, "Show me the law or free Kim Davis." So far, no one has cited a law she has violated. Andrea Tantaros would do well to read it and actually educate herself on what the law is. She, like sodomite Shepard Smith and others, wrongly thinks a Supreme Court's decision is law. It is not.
The Constitution is clear. Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution reads:
All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives. (emphasis mine)
Now, Ms. Tantaros, if all legislative powers are granted to Congress, how much is left for the Supreme Court? How much for any federal court? How much for the Executive Branch? None, zero, zip, nada! They have no legislative power and it's amazing to me that some of these people lose their minds over Obama's executive orders pointing out quite often that they are not law and he doesn't have a right to write law. They will also talk about "legislating from the bench." Well, Tantaros, what do you think the Supreme Court did? They legislated from the bench, which is unconstitutional and illegal and frankly, every judge who ruled against the states in the marriage case should be impeached and then brought up on charges.
Tantaros professed to be a Christian and as a Christian, she should know that God's law is what man's law should be based upon. William Blackstone wrote:
No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the law of God.
Sadly, too many End-times "prophets" and Christians are running around proclaiming to be on the lookout for an electronic "Mark of the Beast" and have failed to realize that symbolism of the mark being on the forehead or the hand was tied directly to the observance of God's Law found in Deuteronomy 6. The Mark of the Beast (Rev. 13:16-18) is following tyrants and their usurped laws instead of God's laws. These people further fail to understand how it is contrasted with those who are redeemed who are also sealed in their foreheads (Rev. 7:3). They are the ones who do what? Keep the commandments of Jesus (The Law of God) (rev. 12:17; 14:12).
As a side note, I'm not saying get an electronic implant. I think we should be wary of any command of government that would make such a requirement law and we should openly reject it, but that is not the point that is being communicated in Revelation 13. It is an issue of who you are bowing to, God or the State, and which one is the Lawgiver. That determines who you are worshipping.
Tantaros is advocating the true Mark of the Beast, not the Law of God.
Beyond that, Tantaros should know that the Constitution did not give authority to the federal government concerning marriage and since it did not do so, those rights are reserved to the states and the people (Tenth Amendment).
It is this stupidity and ignorance that is destroying America. As a Christian, perhaps Tantaros needs to understand what Romans 13 teaches and then tell us why the Nazis were wrong for following their pretended laws and unlawful orders based on those pretended laws. I'll bet she will side with me on that issue, but is completely inconsistent when it comes to Kim Davis, who actually followed the law, but rejected unlawful orders.
Justice Scalia’s dissent on this ruling was quite interesting. He listed several facts about the Supreme Court that I did not realize. All members of the SC are either from the west coast or east cost, and all have degrees from Ivy League schools, mostly Harvard. None are from salt of the earth “fly-over” country. There are NO Protestants on the SC.
So 5 justices on a court completely unrepresentative of our nation decided to permit gay marriage despite thousands of years of cultural experience with homosexuality and religious objection. Cultures evolve certain values for very good reasons.
Considering the current make-up of the SC members, I consider their rulings illegitimate.
Thanks for posting this.
And Andrea isn't?
Rupert Murdock’s bunch of puppets for the most part speak out against freedom of religion. The other night on the “5” they were all against Ms. Davis. Fox News, the WSJ, NBC, NYT, etc. are all in the tank together.
Hey Andrea!
Plessy vs. Ferguson was the law of the land too!
“It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” ― Ronald Reagan
Notice also she doesn't dress like a hooker.
Andrea is one of my favorite FOX personalities but it was disappointing when I learned that she was a big fan of Chris Christie.
“Just stop watching FNC. You’ll feel better.”
Thank you for that. Has anyone figured out that people have different opinions - yes, even Conservatives.
LOL!! I would include some nice pictures I’ve seen but I don’t know how to insert them!
If we say that religious beliefs are above the constitution, then:
1. Ms. Davis should resign.
2. We are back to an Islam vs. Christian-Judeo war, just what ISIS wants.
3. The church runs our military.
I don’t think so.
She needs to go back to school!
Conservatives politely debate the minutiae of law and the Constitution.
Liberals throw us in prison.
Who do you think will win?
...and it is ok for sanctuary city mayors to ignore the laws? She has nice legs, but not one to stand on! I’ve moved on from Fox too. Enjoying OAN on my new “fire.” Kelly was the last straw for me.
The Saudi prince sold his stake, which was 6%, of Fox News in February 2015. He did retain a very minimal 1%, however. So touting 30% is propaganda
. I see similar numbers here all the time so I checked it rather than just accepting his ownership as fact.
I figured out Fox was ‘controlled opposition’ some time ago. It started when Murdock raised money for Killary Clinton.
Haven’t watched them since.
I can’t remember what configuration it was on “The Five,” but I recall one time last year all of the so-called conservatives coming out as pro-amnesty, pro-dope, and pro-fag marriage. To hell with that. This is what constitutes ‘conservatism’ now? Anyone holding such views, well I just have zero interest in hearing their opinions on anything else. And I’m frankly tired of all the gals dressed like streetwalkers.
I virtually never watch FoxNews anymore. It’s been amazingly refreshing to have just excised it from my daily existence. I never quite realized what a negative drag it was in my life.
Haven’t had cable for about 4 years now, but I do miss Andrea Tantaro’s and Kristen Guilfoyle’s legs. Dang!!!
So it’s still Murdoch? That would do it, too my opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.