Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/18/2015 10:59:15 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

Judge should clarify that the order is immediate with no exceptions our qualifications, that if any infringements are reported the issue will be adjudicated next day and if found culpable contempt-of-court will be imposed and punished within the hour upon all parties identified, mayor included.

I have a dream...


2 posted on 09/18/2015 11:03:33 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Where in the Second Admentment does it say Cities or States can create laws, rules or statutes addressing gun ownership? What happened to Rule of Law? Which Washington DC official will go to jail?


3 posted on 09/18/2015 11:04:04 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Dealing with the city of Washington D.C. to buy & carry a gun for self defense like walking though molasses.

They are going put up as many barriers in your way as they can get away with.

To them The Constitution only applies when they want to kick you in the teeth. When it is in your favor they have never heard of it.

4 posted on 09/18/2015 11:11:57 AM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Judges should read the US Constitution.
Last time I heard, Washington DC was part of USA

“the right of the public to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”

period.

“public safety” was and IS not a proper question or test

There is NO TEST, no lawful restriction, period.

Judges are sworn to uphold and obey the constitution of this country, darnit!


6 posted on 09/18/2015 11:31:03 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

While the appeals court correctly strikes down 4 D.C. registration requirements, it incorrectly allows six others to stand.

The Court, in direct contravention of Heller, uses a “balancing test” approach to the registration requirements, actually weighted toway the “rational basis” test.

It remains to be seen if either party will appeal.


7 posted on 09/19/2015 8:54:56 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson