Rotten Fruits of Pope Francis: schism, rebellion, and approval of Iran nuke deal

Fellowship Of The Minds ^ | 9/17/2015 | Dr. Eowyn

[SkyPilot]

No, I read your screed.

Has it never occurred to you, my respected friend, that if you were pope (bear with me in this absurd example) the Washington Post would quote everything you said about Ruth Ginsberg, "Fabulous" Fanning, the UN, the RAF, and the Brewster Buffalo --- edited toward two ends, either to make you sound foolish, OR edited to make it sound like you agreed with them ---- and wouldn't quote a single thing you said about Jesus Christ Our Lord?

I guess I got to you enough that you wanted to research my posts in an attempt to use that against me. That seems to be a trend. I was recently the target iof a Left Wing blog that went after me, but as a former military pilot I know that if you are not taking flak, you are not over the target.

The Devil mixes truth with lies. Your "pope" does the same thing.

Look at this video. It is just a few seconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cREBiH2QAkU

Did you see that? Your "pope" just denied the Divinity of Jesus Christ! And that is who you follow? You are not a sister in Christ to me. You are the same as the people who opposed Moses and Paul - and are destined for the pit.

Father Malachi Martin, who spoke 14 languages and was one of the last Catholics I respected, said in plain terms that there are Satanic worship in the Roman church (he said this years ago) and now Luciferian practices and veneration are the norm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPDs2YajSSs

I really am perplexed. What did you think those 7 links, with the 15 paragraph excerpts, were about?

Again, I read them. Don't get so excited - because it is also clear that you won't respond to my links and postings. That is without dispute. You pick and choose, and ignore facts. It is what you do.

So you really still believe that Jorge is a man of God? In your links, he denies his true intentions.

Here are many links that show who and what he is. Jorge does not really believe Jesus is the only way to Salavation. He said it is NOT! Do you want me to repeat the link I sent to you? He can lie all he wants with fodder for the uneducated and the idiotic.

And your response will be........? Ignore them. I know you by now.

Antipope Francis’ Recent Heresies

https://harvestingthefruit.com/category/blog/

http://www.endtime.com/endtime-magazine-articles/pope-francis-false-prophet/

http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/watchman-on-the-wall/50752-why-so-many-people-think-pope-francis-is-the-antichrist

http://nationalreport.net/pope-francis-followers-koran-holy-bible/

http://biblefalseprophet.com/

And one of the best sources:

The Sayings of Pope Francis Vs. The Bible

[Mrs. Don-o]

Quoting someone and providing links, as I did, is not a "screed". it's "evidence."

One more comment: your 8-second video clip, Pope Francis says the same thing about Jesus that Jesus Himself said:

Luke 24:39-40
"Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see Me to have.” And when He had thus spoken, He showed them His hands and His feet."

As a Catholic, Pope Francis professes that Jesus is True God and True Man, a divine Person with both a divine and a human nature. This is what is meant by the Hypostatic Union (LINK). This is what Pope Francis and every other historic Christian professes every time we say the Nicene Creed.

If you think a 8-second sound clip shows otherwise, you are very much mistaken.

[SkyPilot]

I really am perplexed.

Actually, I don't believe you are.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Good bye, and God bless you.

[SkyPilot]

Quoting someone and providing links, as I did, is not a "screed". it's "evidence."

It was a screed. It listed all the lies and falsehoods by Jorge.

And if you really care of "EVIDENCE", you would have commented on the numerous links I sent you that documented that Jorge is an enemy of Jesus Christ.

But you don't have the courage to do that.

By the way, what blackmail did Jorge use? I really would like to know.

[SkyPilot]

You cannot position yourself as “above it all.” Pretty soon you will be posting your propaganda again here, and I will challenge you.

[RetiredArmy]

Wrong. Jesus Christ is THE ROCK. Catholics have that scripture totally wrong. All through Scripture Christ is a “stone of stumbling”, or the Rock. Christ is the Rock mentioned here, not the Peter.

[RetiredArmy]

And P.S. Peter HAS NOT THRONE. Only The Father sites on the throne in Heaven at this time. Jesus sits at His right hand. NOT Peter. And it will never be Peter.

[RetiredArmy]

The Bible says that EVERYONE has it written in them a knowledge of a Creator. Thus, that person in the jungle as you say, does have knowledge of a Creator God. Simple as that. That is why Jesus will be able to judge EVERYONE who ever lived on this planet either at the Great White Throne or Bema Seat. We will make a choice of which that will be. What you may believe will determine yours also.

[terycarl]

Since this ‘pontiff’ reins over an institution that is clearly not Catholic and amounts to the establishment of an entirely new heretic form of religion, many of us feel that we don’t belong there. Our presence is a sign that we approve of Vatican II whose actions led us to this now thoroughly evil ‘pontiff.’

CALM DOWN, calm down.....take a chill pill, everything will be O.K. The church is doing just fine, has, with minor glitches (revolutions) for 2015 years and will continue to do so until the end of time....remember His promise?????

[HomerBohn]

God gave us a calmative: Sedevacantist Churches in which we can bide our time left on eart. So, this doesn’t mean that we should just sit down and hope it goes away. Catholics must be proactive.

Remember, The Roman Catholic Church isn’t part of the mod scene. Jesus doesn’t wear Nikes and Catholic means universal. That meant one could go to mass in Paris and understand what was happening....and it was something mystical and divine.

[HomerBohn]

“Upon this rock (Peter) I will build my Church.....”

[Zionist Conspirator]

"... blame everything on the "Jewish conspiracy" and believe the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is 100% for real."

Provide one stitch of evidence that anyone currently in the Roman Catholic hierarchy or administration believes the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion." I find this totally unworthy of credibility.

And I mean evidence, not accusation.

Please forgive this late reply.

I notice that you provided only the very end of my quote. The original was referring specifically to "traditionalist" Catholics (ie, Sedevacantists and Feeneyites). I assure you that those two groups most assuredly believe in a "Jewish conspiracy" and in the Protocols. All you have to do is peruse their web sites. While I will not soil FR with links, I will provide them to you privately if you wish. Or at least I can assure you that the St. Benedict Center and Tradition in Action certainly do believe in both of those things.

The first part of my quote, which you cut off, was referring to mainstream "orthodox" Catholics such as yourself and most Catholics on FR. These are too liberal, for the most part subscribing to both higher criticism of the Bible and to cosmic evolution. This surely needs no proof, as the opinions of your fellow Catholics, articles in mainstream publications, and (perhaps) your own beliefs will testify.

Here is the problem of Catholicism: one has two choices--liberalism, or anti-Semitic conspiracism. There appears to be no middle ground. When faced with a choice between papolatrous Assisi ecumenism and the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on one hand and Robert Sungenis or the St. Benedict Center on the other, there is obviously no place in this religion for anyone from a Fundamentalist Protestant background--period.

I'm a little disappointed that you cherry-picked my quote.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I guess I didn't understand your quote.

Sedevacantists and Feenyites who do not acknowledge themselves as ecclesiastic subjects of the Pope, are not Catholic. You really can't attribute to Catholicism the antics of ex-Catholics and anti-Catholics.