Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gen.Blather
The sides have no active armor, but also, judging by the size of the mounting hardware they do not appear to be armored beyond rifle ammo. It appears this is light, cheap, fast and disposable.

With modern anti-tank weapons, if you are armored enough to resist them, then you are too heavy to move, to heavy to cross bridges, and too heavy to transport by air. So you might as well scale back the armor to what will stop .50 cal and shrapnel.

I'm thinking the next-gen tank will be unmanned (controlled by somebody well behind it) but capable of serious firepower.

13 posted on 09/19/2015 8:54:23 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
that'd be the T-14

The Armata's chief designer, Andrei Terlikov, said that the new technologies built into the Armata could make it possible in the future to build a fully robotic vehicle that would operate autonomously on the battlefield.

22 posted on 09/19/2015 9:25:46 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson