Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Pedophilia Next?
Charisma ^ | 9:30AM EDT 9/23/2015 | MICHAEL BROWN

Posted on 09/23/2015 11:16:00 AM PDT by robowombat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: W.Lee

Thats exactly why I don’t think you’ll see pedophillia legalized, ever.

If it gets legalized it strips away the belief that the system works to protect the innocent. People will start taking matters into their own hands and a lot of pedophiles will end up taking dirt naps. Those that put them there will have the benefit of a little thing called “jury nullification.”

So the anti-pedophile laws have the impact of protecting (relatively speaking) pedophiles. Right now if someone gets busted for pedophilia they go to jail. Not a heck of a lot of fun, but they don’t end up, you know, dead. And in the situation where they get the snot kicked out of them by fellow prisoners they end up in the peace and quiet and safety of protective custody.


41 posted on 09/23/2015 1:17:37 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Yeah, that’s cool, because when the rules come down, I have some scores to settle.


42 posted on 09/23/2015 1:18:02 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verga

You are right on.

A pedophile is no more sick than a homosexual.

The problem is he is no more well either.

They are both deviants, they are both partly or wholly broken, they are given to-—and give in to-—desires that are inimical to personal health and to a healthy community.

Practicing homosexuals should be tolerated at best and regarded as just what they are, sexually perverted human beings.

Faggots being “gay,” being “married,” being no less normal than the rest of us AND probably more sensitive and caring than the rest of us....these kind of rigidly enforced attitudes are but a prelude to the freak show to come.


43 posted on 09/23/2015 1:25:09 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I am required by state law to receive regular training in child abuse reporting, and undergo mandatory background checks, due to the past sins of pedophile Priests.

Aren’t we all so glad that the seminaries actively recruited homos, according to the Spirit of Vatican II...?

The post consiliar fruits taste so sweet, don’t they...?


44 posted on 09/23/2015 5:19:04 PM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Is Pedophilia Next?

Next!?

It's now. The place is already crawling with boy-raping queers.

45 posted on 09/23/2015 5:21:39 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republican Freed the Slaves" month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

They are effing sick, and should be put down like rabid dogs!


46 posted on 09/23/2015 7:47:45 PM PDT by Taxman (H. L. Mencken correctly observed: Government is actually the worst failure of civilized man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Oh please, please, please make it legal!!!

I want to be in on this massacre so badly, all we need is for them to step out of the dark for just a second and this disgusting crap will be cured!


47 posted on 09/23/2015 7:52:46 PM PDT by Randy Larsen (Aim small, Miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat; little jeremiah; wagglebee
I had already read the article in Salon before I saw this link on Free Republic.

After the Supreme Court decision on gay marriage, I see no possible way to avoid the inevitable legalization of polygamous marriage between consenting adults, and with minors under 18 whose parents have given legal consent to a polygamous marriage.

Parental consent to underage marriages has been allowed for a very long time, probably for as long as we have had marriage licenses. Back in the 1800s when many males left school after eighth grade and a 16-year-old may have had a good income from farming or a trade, that wasn't a bad thing if the parents agreed a 16-year-old was ready for marriage.

Today, however, the longstanding precedents allowing underage marriages and the common practice in polygamist circles of second “marriages” to much younger women seem guaranteed to lead to acceptance of these relationships once polygamy is legalized.

Once polygamy is legalized, which it probably has to be, and once male-female marriages between older adult men and adolescent girls are allowed, which they probably have to be, I can see no possible legal argument for saying unmarried man-boy relationships are forbidden when the same relationship between an older man and teenage girl could result in a legal marriage. Maybe for a while parental consent will be the key for unmarried relationships. But it's only a matter of time until some 16-year-old boy gets manipulated into suing for his “right” to a relationship with an older man.

Maybe I'm wrong. I hope I am.

But I don't see any legal way to avoid this as a logical conclusion of what the Supreme Court has decided.

48 posted on 09/30/2015 8:44:55 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Nope. It’s simple...act line a demon from hell, get treated like a demon from hell. Enough said.


49 posted on 02/22/2017 3:30:09 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Jerry Sandusky wasn’t wrong. He was just early. /sarc


50 posted on 02/22/2017 3:38:52 AM PST by Hardastarboard (Freedom Trumps Fascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

It has backfired.


51 posted on 02/22/2017 3:42:03 AM PST by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

I’m afraid if the starving of Venezuela endorse more socialism, the Americans could do likewise with their fascination for kinky sex.


52 posted on 02/22/2017 3:52:00 AM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Milo engaged in a bit of misdirection in his press conference yesterday when asked about the link between homosexuality and pedophilia.

He dismissed the link by saying that there reportedly were only a slightly more pedophiles reportedly attracted to boys than to girls. However, with approximately 20x the number of heterosexuals to homosexuals, that means that gays are more than 20x as likely to have that leaning.


53 posted on 02/22/2017 3:53:44 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: immadashell

Even though Moynihan defined “deviancy” this way, he voted for all liberal programs to my knowledge and proposed one Hillary Rodham Clinton as his senatorial successor. Got his wish on nearly everything! And hapless New Yorkers who can still remember him adore him.


54 posted on 02/22/2017 3:54:33 AM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

Actually, I haven’t heard very many American “citizens” at all complaining about the undermining of the Boy Scouts. Did many take their boys out of the organization? The secretary of state now is a big Boy Scout gay booster.


55 posted on 02/22/2017 3:56:43 AM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

***The primary tactic is to erode age of consent laws an inch at a time. It’s an agrees I’ve agenda driven by lust.***

The autocorrect feature was very aggressive on your post, wasn’t it? ;)


56 posted on 02/22/2017 4:54:14 AM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace; MrEdd

I just now realized that someone has resurrected this years old thread and put it into the sidebar. Interesting that it is more current than ever.


57 posted on 02/22/2017 5:04:33 AM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

LGBTQP. Yet another letter added to the perverted sexual degenerate soup?


58 posted on 02/22/2017 5:26:21 AM PST by Stopthethreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace

Autocorrect gets worse as the years go by. You used to see what it mangled your typing into before you started typing the next word. Now it retroactivity mangles entire previous phrases.


59 posted on 02/22/2017 5:27:54 AM PST by MrEdd (MrEdd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
>>Is Pedophilia Next?


Nah. Couldn't happen.  We're gonna add a "conservative" to the Supreme Court!

Right?

...Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch?  He belongs to a far-left church that embraces marriage redefinition, gun control, and the theory of man-caused global warming.

He belongs to St. John's Episcopal Church in Boulder, Colo., the Episcopal diocese of Colorado confirmed on Wednesday. Church bulletins show that the judge has been an usher three times in recent months. His wife Louise frequently leads the intercessory prayer and reads the weekly Scripture at Sunday services, and his daughters assist in ceremonial duties during church services as acolytes.

The first word that St. John's uses to describe itself on its website and Facebook page is "inclusive," and the church is led by a female rector. On its website, the church encourages members to write letters to Congress asking for actions addressing climate change.

That's not all.  Its website also calls for members to lobby their congressmen for more gun control.

And more:

Rev. Susan Springer has said she is pro-gay marriage and offers blessings to same-sex couples

The church's Rev. Ted Howard also signed a letter slamming the 'disrespectful rhetoric' directed at Islam as Trump floated a ban on Muslim immigrants[.] ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3523436/posts


 

60 posted on 02/22/2017 7:17:45 AM PST by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson