Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: willyd
Actually, the U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 requires "Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—'I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.'”

The U.S. Constitution is based upon English Common Law, and its provisions are incomprehensible except with reference to the common law in effect at the time.

Anyone whose faith required adherence to a body of law anathema to common law (e.g. Sharia Law) would incapable of taking the required oath and therefore would be constitutionally unfitted to be President.

14 posted on 09/24/2015 6:52:06 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson

Just Common Sense.

But Common Sense is non-existent with the “publik school” indoctrination systems (which are unconstitutional) where people don’t have a coherent thought in their heads anymore and no ability to “think” in abstract ways.

Faith can NEVER be separated from ideas. ALL PEOPLE HAVE FAITH——there is no such thing as a “person” who doesn’t have “faith”.

Separation of Church and State has MORPHED INTO Faith and State-—which is incoherent and impossible.

The Marxists twist Words and Language and destroy all Traditions and History by rewriting history—EVERYTHING-—is based on a Big Lie.

SO, Mr. Cruz....SOME FAITH is antithetical to the First Principles in the Constitution which INCLUDES Natural Laws and God’s Laws-——not the moon god’s laws and not satanic “laws” which make the Constitution and our Natural Rights ONLY from God, which are unalienable, MEANINGLESS.

Marxists, muslims, voodooism, satanism are all antithetical to Natural Law and God’s Laws and are incoherent-—and IRRATIONAL and should NEVER be allowed “faiths” in anyone who holds office and SWEARS an oath to uphold the Constitution which they HAVE to do.....but we see the sodomite Marxist who now has destroyed Rule of Law for his Rule of Man.

He should be impeached for Treason as 5 on the Supreme Court should be. Disgusting how people don’t understand Worldview as CRUCIAL to our type of Government. Just stupid to allow people who have NO concept of Individualism and true Freedom from majority tyranny (evil democracies).


45 posted on 09/24/2015 7:20:07 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: AndyJackson
Anyone whose faith required adherence to a body of law anathema to common law (e.g. Sharia Law) would incapable of taking the required oath and therefore would be constitutionally unfitted to be President.

We have two Muslim members of the House. They must take an oath as well. The oath used today has not changed since 1966 and is prescribed in Title 5, Section 3331 of the United States Code.

It reads: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

In contrast to the presidential oath, where it’s used only by tradition, the phrase “so help me God” has been part of the official oath of office for non-presidential offices since 1862.

55 posted on 09/24/2015 7:42:58 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson