That’s pure 100% gold plated bullsqueeze.
She shoplifted and yeah, that was wrong. But the very fact she didn’t walk into the school nurse and brazenly demand them tells me she was probably a sweet little girl, embarrassed as hell, and not one of the current crop of brazen whores.
There is actually a grand cross cultural tradition (possibly excepting Holland) of kids shoplifting condoms because they felt too embarrassed to face a pharmacist.
And how do you know he objectifies her?
Maybe they were a couple feeling in love. For all you know he never even tried anything and she just wanted to be ready because she sensed it was going that way.
And you have him as an objectifying, bad father, impregnating, diseased liarmouth.
But even if you believed all that, there is no case for distancing yourself from her. And anyway, lost likely she was a 19 year old daughter who did nothing more than have a normal sexual feeling for her boyfriend.
I bet she even had good grades in school, and her boyfriend too.
“she was probably a sweet little girl”
Oh yeah. This was the one about the Amish girl raised by the Muslims. I forgot.
Admittedly I am reading between the lines, but I am certain no one is of any meaningful character in this story.
She was a thief! Sweet little girls do not steal, embarrassed or otherwise. I’ll give you that maybe she wasn’t a brazen whore, just a subtle one; maybe that was why the boy was attracted to her.
He objectified her because the need or desire for sex surpassed every other restraint. If he cared for her, he would have restrained himself and waited. If he cared for her, he would have restrained himself and purchased the condoms himself or perhaps he too was a shy little Amish boy. Her father objectifies women. He sought an arranged marriage for her. Her parents’ marriage is probably the product of an arrangement. After 19 years with him she learned that women are objects, but instead of lifting herself up above that she chose to allow herself to be objectified by someone he opposed. Very common. (Most people who grow up in abusive households choose mates very similar to the abusers they grew up with). Her father was obviously domineering and she did this boyfriend thing consciously or unconsciously to oppose him but in fact chose a carbon copy of her father as evident by the young man’s lack of initiative to buy condoms and the desire to use her.
Fine. Let us buy your argument for a minute: Best case scenario, she was a perfect child in every sense as was the young man, A1 students and people. Embarrassed by the purchase of a prophylactic, she took the less embarrassing route of committing a crime that garnered her public attention. I’ll buy that and in which case it only makes her an idiot.
I cannot accept the normalizing of illicit sex as it takes us down a very dark road indeed.
Bottom line; everyone in this story is low and it is why I cannot care for anyone in it. I might as well watch the Bad Lieutenant again. YUCK