Skip to comments.
Restaurant Refuses Service To Soldier For Carrying Firearm
Lex18 ^
| Sep 28, 2015
Posted on 09/29/2015 12:19:40 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 last
To: Slings and Arrows; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; ...
To: SoFloFreeper
Having never been drunk enough to dine in a Waffle House at 2am, I certainly see no need to start doing so now.
82
posted on
09/29/2015 7:02:24 PM PDT
by
Rodamala
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
At any rate we have an apparent conflict between two rights; i.e. Right to Carry, and private property with its right to exclude. I agree there is a conflict of rights here. Now:
As to "Right to Carry", I believe that's clearly documented in the Second Amendment (A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.)
As to "right to exclude", where exactly is that clearly documented? I'm not saying it doesn't exist, I want to know where it's documented.
83
posted on
09/29/2015 7:16:34 PM PDT
by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: monkeyshine
“No conflict. His property, his rules.”
Can he make any rules he wants to because it’s his property?
Can he deny me the free speech right to say “No” to a sexual advance? Can he deny me the Liberty right to leave his property once I’m on it?
84
posted on
09/29/2015 7:19:30 PM PDT
by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: Slings and Arrows; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...
85
posted on
09/29/2015 8:05:32 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
To: LowOiL
For a night owl like me, that sounds pretty close to heaven.
86
posted on
09/29/2015 9:15:10 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(My music: http://hopalongginsberg.com/ | Facebook: Hopalong Ginsberg | Instagram: hopalonginsberg)
To: Slings and Arrows
If he had a weapon with him he was on duty and acting responsible with protecting his weapon. Unlike some CIA idiots in Memphis left their weapons in their van which was then stolen. The food is lousy any way for the price.
87
posted on
09/29/2015 9:31:21 PM PDT
by
GailA
(Those who break Promises to Our Troops, you won't keep them to anyone. Ret. SCPO's wife)
To: GailA
This WH is owned by individual franchisee. No need to condemn the whole chain.
88
posted on
09/29/2015 9:34:58 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(My music: http://hopalongginsberg.com/ | Facebook: Hopalong Ginsberg | Instagram: hopalonginsberg)
To: Slings and Arrows
Just get the food to go, mental note... “never go back”
89
posted on
09/29/2015 10:58:09 PM PDT
by
TexasTransplant
(Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
To: NorthMountain
**** “2) For many years we have had a No Firearms police in place in our restaurants. We continue to believe this is the best policy for the safety of our customers and associates. That’s completely retarded. With apologies to actual retards, who can’t help it. Criminal Safety Zones have proven, over and over, to be extremely BAD policy for the safety of customers and associates.” ****
Next question .. ya gonna let someone that stupid cook your food?
90
posted on
09/29/2015 11:00:02 PM PDT
by
TexasTransplant
(Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
To: monkeyshine
**** “No conflict. His property, his rules” ****
I repeat myself but if they are that stupid would you let them cook your food? Or better question... Would you eat what they cooked for you?
Pretty simple for me, it just turned into a “do not return” and I let Capitalism take it’s course.
91
posted on
09/29/2015 11:05:41 PM PDT
by
TexasTransplant
(Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
To: sergeantdave
Some WH’s are owned by franchisees and some by WH corp, which I guess accounts for the variation in policies.
92
posted on
09/29/2015 11:18:47 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(My music: http://hopalongginsberg.com/ | Facebook: Hopalong Ginsberg | Instagram: hopalonginsberg)
To: wgmalabama
That sounds like a depressingly viable tactic.
93
posted on
09/29/2015 11:21:08 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(My music: http://hopalongginsberg.com/ | Facebook: Hopalong Ginsberg | Instagram: hopalonginsberg)
To: NorthMountain
Actual retards can’t read your post so no worries
Still...good to be cautious
94
posted on
09/29/2015 11:21:15 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(i)
To: Norm Lenhart
Not proactive enough. Avoidance too often forgets or loses interest.
95
posted on
09/29/2015 11:28:02 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: KrisKrinkle
It is the Common Law and Statutory law.
To: WayneS
It wouldn’t be the first time a hoplophobic business owner excluded armed cops.
97
posted on
09/30/2015 5:13:31 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: NorthMountain; Slings and Arrows
Indeed. Gun-free zones are just target-rich environments.
An active shooter barging into the restaurant is not going
to drop his gun and walk out because it’s a gun-free zone.
98
posted on
09/30/2015 10:28:04 AM PDT
by
TheOldLady
(I miss the Gipper. Wish we still had someone like him.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson