[Zakeet]

... it seemed like such a good idea at the time ...

Other subheadings in the article:

• That wedding wasn’t legal then, but might have legal consequences now
  
• “There are going to be financial consequences.”
  
• Gay marriage means gay divorces
  
• Obergefell: “a windfall for divorce attorneys”

[Jim from C-Town]

Gay Divorce: Who gets possession of the prolapse rectum? Bonus: Both!

[tbw2]

Wait until the common law gay marriage arguments show up to interfere with settled estates.

[Vigilanteman]

LOL! The GAYstapo had such great intentions. They only wanted to use Obergefell as a tool to bludgeon traditional Christians and other opponents into submission.

[fwdude]

Sodomites will claim that the same rules don't apply to them, as usual. Watch and see.

Amazingly, they'll inevitably use the issue that they harped on, children, to push for their perverted definition to now disclaim the reason: "We can't naturally have children and so the issues surrounding custody don't apply."

[Red Badger]

Typically, a lot of homos are wealthy. Imagine then, their surprise when one day their current ‘houseboy’ walks in with a lawyer claiming half of everything he owns........................

[longfellow]

The first couple married in America are all ready divorced. They just have to figure out who’s the woman and then screw the other queer.

[kingu]

Ah, the continued fiction that courts pass laws. Guys calling themselves married can only be legislated.

[TBP]

Many years ago, there was a movie musical called The Gay Divorcee. Of course, gay had a somewhat different meaning then, but the possibilities here are numerous.

[nitzy]

generally the requirements are that the couple are both legally able to marry (they both freely consent, are not already married to other people, are of sound mind, and are of legal age>

I think I see the loophole here.

[pepsi_junkie]

While the law differs from state to state, generally the requirements are that the couple are both legally able to marry (they both freely consent, are not already married to other people, are of sound mind, and are of legal age or have their parents’ consent)...

Who says all these restrictions exist? Used to be that men couldn't marry men but that was deemed unfair. So what if three people want to get married, if they all consent who is to say it's not permissible under the current Supreme Court logic of "go with the zeitgiest and let legal precedent be damned!"?

It's all just one unelected judge away from being the law of the land, permanently and irrevocably.

[fwdude]

Here is a juicy comment in the comments section after the column:

"Another consequence of same sex marriage being made legal is that same sex couples may not enjoy the same employment benefits if they are not married.

Corporations are dropping unmarried same-sex couples from insurance benefits."

And most sodomite couples despise the thought of entering into a legal relationship that hamstrings them so much, especially the tacit expectation of fidelity. This is going to get interesting.

[Yaelle]

Heh heh heh heh.

So you’ve been living with your favorite gay squeeze for years, he’s such a lazy slacker, but you keep him in your chic penthouse apartment because hey he cooks and gives good service, and you two have been at every gay marriage success party you could get to in your rainbow shirts. Yay you.

Well, it seems your boyfriend can now grab an attorney and sue you for palimony and half of all your stuff. And you didn’t even GET married. Gee, still cheering????