That's what Enlightened1 was saying up in post 7, but I really don't know y'all are getting this. The article was crammed w/ mind-numbing specifics and everything we got so far is here. What we don't know about yet is what doen't exist yet because there's no agreement. When we do get an agreement we'll read it and then tell congress how to vote on it. If someone's tagged something in that we don't want we can kill it then ---because of what we know is there and not what we're pretending is there. In the mean time what we do see is what we do want so let's go for it..
I realize there are a lot of players involved in these negotiations and therefore there is a lot to deal with. Even so - or maybe because of it - I simply expect that 0bama's guiding principal in this agreement is to continue his "fundamental change of America" to the detriment of the US of A. His track record to date supports this belief.