Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76
No, the POINT is that Trump has a non-conservative, authoritarian, and leftist view of government power when it comes to property. He believes that governments and big developers' interests should take precedent over property owners' interests if they can successfully use eminent domain to confiscate property.

No developer should EVER try to use the government to forcefully take someone's property for the benefit of a private development. I don't care what the leftists on the Supreme Court said in Kelo; it's unconstitutional and not a "public use".

Quit apologizing for him. I'm not saying he did anything illegal, but it was certainly wrong and immoral.

262 posted on 10/07/2015 1:18:41 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]


To: GunRunner

Again, neither Trump or any other developer has the ability to forcefully take any private property. They must follow the process and a court of law will decide the matter. Eminent domain goes back to our founding fathers. It is in the Constitution. The Constiturion also makes provision for fair compensation but in practice, the compensation greatly exceeds market value.


265 posted on 10/07/2015 3:02:06 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (A businessman gets things done with own money. A politician takes money and gets nothing done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson