It isn't general at all, which shows you didn't even look at it. The IJ lists dozens of success stories out of the many thousands of cases they've handled, with specifics and news articles on the cases, as well as current projects and cases that they're working on that deal with Eminent Domain abuse.
If you don't think Eminent Domain Abuse is real, then you don't care, aren't paying attention, or are just equivocating for Trump.
The entire nature of the Kelo case is antithetical to a conservative's understand of liberty and the Constitution, so you must hail from somewhere else, where they like the views of Ginsberg, Breyer, Souter, and Stevens.
OK name the most egregious case? The case that symbolizes how Kelo is just the absolutely worst thing to happen to our beloved Republic in the last century at least.