Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton: Idea That You Need More Guns To Battle Shooters "Not Only Illogical, But Offensive"
RCP Video ^ | 10-7-2015 | RCP transcript

Posted on 10/07/2015 1:30:50 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Sir Napsalot

The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun.


41 posted on 10/07/2015 2:09:09 PM PDT by gdzla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

You are the offensive one PIAPS.


42 posted on 10/07/2015 2:09:17 PM PDT by Rannug ("all enemies, foreign and : domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr
I think Trump just a few days ago said we need teachers armed - so that is “more” guns in a manner. At least more guns where they could be needed. And Cruz in the past is a strong support of gun rights, including helping build a coalition (for concealed carry?) and taking it up with the Supreme Court and winning. I'm not sure Cruz has mentioned anything about “more guns” with regard to this shooting. I know he did chastise obama for politicizing it.
43 posted on 10/07/2015 2:10:02 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

...says the most illogical and offensive biotch in recorded history.


44 posted on 10/07/2015 2:12:43 PM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

No Hillary, that’s not what ‘the other side’ is calling for.
The other side is calling for guns that are already possessed be in effective locations. Able to return fire.


45 posted on 10/07/2015 2:13:37 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I find HRC’s hypocrisy in stating the oath of office for SOS, to uphold and defend the Constitution offensive.


46 posted on 10/07/2015 2:25:28 PM PDT by Fireone (BLM?.....#NTD (no they don't!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

If you listen to the armed guards who are assigned to protect her,they would be happy to be relieved of that task the way she treats them


47 posted on 10/07/2015 2:26:43 PM PDT by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I suggest she get rid of her SS detail then along with any and all private security she may employ.

*****************************************

“If Hillary Clinton wins, she will be the only president in history to have already had 24 years of Secret Service protection before she even takes the oath of office.”

Link: http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/10/hillary-clinton-inside-circle-huma-abedin


48 posted on 10/07/2015 2:30:04 PM PDT by Qiviut (Stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of the cross; lift high his royal banner, it must not loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Hillary ,,,,, Our right to keep and bear arms was a right given us in the Constitution to protect us from Tyrants like you who wish to remove such rights . Self protection , hunting , sport shooting and collecting etc. are nice but please don’t forget what the intention of the 2nd Amendment was meant for and still is .


49 posted on 10/07/2015 2:35:48 PM PDT by Lionheartusa1 ()-: ISIS is Islam without the lipstick :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Did she say this in her fake, down with the brothers dialect, the east coast elite one , or her regular way of speaking, the nagging wife voice?


50 posted on 10/07/2015 2:41:28 PM PDT by dznutz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dznutz

Yes.


51 posted on 10/07/2015 3:08:12 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Don’t be illogical and offensive, Hillary. Let the Secret Service and their gun go. You don’t need them.


52 posted on 10/07/2015 3:16:57 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

She just can’t deal with the facts that, 1. she’s a has-been; and, 2. if there were any justice in the Obama era, she’d be in prison.


53 posted on 10/07/2015 3:19:43 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

“I suggest she get rid of her SS detail then along with any and all private security she may employ.”

As another FReeper pointed out, Lurker, Hillary would say that she needs armed security because so many right-wing gun nuts are armed.


54 posted on 10/07/2015 3:42:42 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Hillary C, is a khunt.


55 posted on 10/07/2015 3:54:16 PM PDT by Catholic Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

When I did contract work for Israeli companies back in 2011 while the Libyan civil war was going into high gear, the Israelis intercepted communication from Hillary at the State Department.

Hillary was literally screeching in horror that Quadhafi’s elite guard and NWO bureaucrats were getting hanged from lampposts by the thousands.

My conclusion is that she fears that her bodyguards will be shot dead, and she’ll be dragged into the street and hanged from a lamppost.


56 posted on 10/07/2015 4:09:24 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

WHAT DOES A MULTIPLE FELON RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT KNOW ABOUT
l o g i c
i cant stop laughing


57 posted on 10/07/2015 4:37:44 PM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Megalomaniacal congenital liars are the very model of "illogical" and the very definition of repellantly "offensive".

.

58 posted on 10/07/2015 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtd

Thanks,
Woods and Doherty.


59 posted on 10/07/2015 7:32:56 PM PDT by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

I appreciate the explanation. I can be too literal in my thinking at times, and I wasn’t making that connection.


60 posted on 10/11/2015 1:47:30 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson