To: princess leah
I agree. Look how well even conservatives have been retrained, right here on FR.
13 posted on
10/08/2015 1:20:43 AM PDT by
Crazieman
(Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
To: Crazieman
she is not a security guard nor a police officer. she could have done any number of other things than that.
18 posted on
10/08/2015 1:27:01 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Crazieman
Amazing isn’t it? Sheeple among us. Many steeple.
19 posted on
10/08/2015 1:28:01 AM PDT by
antceecee
(Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
To: Crazieman
I question if they are even conservatives—damn spineless women!
44 posted on
10/08/2015 3:51:47 AM PDT by
Roman_War_Criminal
(This Hispanic wants a wall, the National Guard, and turrets guarding our border)
To: Crazieman
As one with a CWP, the ROE in ND would allow me to shoot an Afghani policemen butt-raping some village boy (unlike the ROE the US Military operates under over there), but they won't let me shoot someone for shoplifting. The standard is to prevent 'serious injury or death', not to prevent property crime, nor to detain a fleeing suspect in a property crime.
46 posted on
10/08/2015 3:59:12 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Crazieman; princess leah
It isn’t that conservatives have been “retrained”.
It is that the responsibility for owning and carrying a deadly firearm includes being able to discriminate on when to use it.
It isn’t appropriate to shoot someone because they are shoplifting, that isn’t even open to discussion.
54 posted on
10/08/2015 4:43:25 AM PDT by
rlmorel
("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson