He DIDN’T go from 1% to 3%. When you factor in the margin of error in such a survey, he went from [between 0% and 3.8%] to [between .2% and 5.8%], or quite likely no movement at all.
When the numbers get that low, it is impossible to get an accurate reading.
When I read the article that was my thinking as well. They might be making a story out of statistical noise.
Since when is it news when a bottom feeder makes an infinitesimal move? What’s next? Lindsey Graham moving from 0% to .5%?