Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nickname
What in the article is incorrect?

In the implication that Bush could have done something material in the 35 days between the August 6 briefing and September 11.

We have to remember that the Democrats were still stalling on confirming his Cabinet nominations as payback for "selected not elected." He was late getting started because Clinton wouldn't release transition funding during Gore's election challenge.

So Bush didn't have his infrastructure in place to rapidly deploy any kind of counter-intelligence operation of a vague nature.

-PJ

59 posted on 10/17/2015 6:54:25 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

The author brings up issues leading up to August, but I suppose Bush was barely even innaugerated then.

I don’t blame him for 911, but I do hold him partially responsible for what’s happened since. In retrospect, he wasn’t serious about executing the war, he didn’t enforce many of our laws that could have prevented more loss of innocent life, and he let many lies go unchallenged which helped usher in Obama.


99 posted on 10/17/2015 7:21:17 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson