Posted on 10/22/2015 5:41:18 AM PDT by kristinn
Look, it’s Barney!
Cummings is an illiterate yessa boss to his democrat masters. And he keeps getting elected year after year. If I were Gowdy I’d have a US marshal standing by with Cummings in the room. He ain’t wrapped too tight.
She probably thinks she nailed it and nobody has the courage to let her know the truth.
AMEN. Fox highlighting how Jordan’s reference to the 3 emails HRC sent out right after the attack shows she knew it was a terrorist attack and that the reference to the video was a flat out lie to cover O’s butt.
And they accuse the Pubbies of being political!
When does Hillary go before the FBI to testify? If there is too much time, that gives the Clintons time to do what they do best. Pay people off or blackmail them. They don’t care if they use the carrot or the stick.
Gowdy is absolutely the best.
pretty sure she wears depends..but point made!
Gowdy had to kind of beat the Dems....These aren't Blumenthal emails....they're Hillary's emails.
So where are her responses to him?
The sign on her desk there says “Honorable Clinton”. Wow! If THAT isn’t an oxymoron!
It's interesting at times, but are minds being changed? Is any normal person likely to form their opinion based on this or change their mind because of what they're seeing? I have real doubts about that. Occasionally there are some moments where the focus is good, but too often it just seems chaotic no matter what side you're on.
I think that Gowdy should eliminate much of the trivia and just focus on a couple of major themes. Just stick to those and seek more clarity.
I think when she got testy she realized the walk in the park just became a walk through the park but it was the northside of central park at night.
Just logged into this thread and seeing nothing but pessimism on the first page.
Does nobody have any hope that we can finally put a stake through the heart of that horrible woman?
Fox has good coverage.
Well, maybe so, but there is lots of tainted cash as the bottom of that rabbit hole.
When she gets a question that comes uncomfortably close to the truth, she responds with
“I have no recollection.”
“I can’t speak to specifics.”
“Gaddafi and his threats to his own people.”
I noticed that, too....and she’s reading directly.
As I heard it: "You can tell the truth, like you told your family, the Egyptian President and the Libyan Ambassador, but you chose a protest from The Video."
I absolutely agree. Jordan and Gowdy are the only ones who seem to have done the digging and prep to ask questions that mean anything. Everyone else so far is just posturing. Schiff was coherent as was Sanchez, but they are in CCA mode and are feeding Clinton her own talking points and narrative and softball questions.
I wonder if she needs a drink before she comes back?
CNN describing the Blumenthal angle is a “rabbit hole”. CNN panel asking why in the world Howdy spent so much time on Blumenthal (who was not a government employee and was not involved) and not a single moment in his 10 minutes on any of the four victims.
You can always tell when you are hitting Leftists where it hurts. They immediately go for these "attack and distract" tactics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.