[100American]

For your information only, read or discard as you see fit

[Jim Noble]

Why can’t two non-gay brothers marry, for that matter - as a tax strategy, for example.

[mkmensinger]

The horse is out of the barn and anything goes. Same sex marriage supporters have no principle they can point to and say “we can’t have this”. I can foresee a father “marrying” his son and thereby avoiding inheritance taxes.

[lee martell]

And here I thought after the Obama Gang and Pope Francis, nothing more could ever shock me.

[cloudmountain]

Next folks will demand to marry their pets.

I guess there are just too many who have forgotten the words of God...one man, one woman.

[Dallas59]

[Jim from C-Town]

I predicted years ago, on this board that in the near future a very wealth man would attempt to marry a son or daughter in order to avoid probate and inheritance taxes. There is no longer a ,moral or ethical reason to stop such marriages.

Finally we have found a way to eliminate the death tax!

[Secret Agent Man]

Anything other than man/wife is ofensive to the very nature of what marriage is.

The definition is not any two people in lust and/or wanting legal benefits and to pay the marriage penalty.

Inmates runing all stratas of the asylum. Cwii cant come fast enough the way i feel today.

[aimhigh]

Mental illness on display.

[o-n-money]

Why not...it shouldn’t affect their kids.

[cherry]

let'em all marry each other...I am emotionally separating from the evil Satanists sheeple....

I just wish these 24/7 debauchery wouldn't take so much of my paycheck..

[umgud]

So, will this be discrimination against brother/sister marriage by allowing brother/brother marriage?

After all, it is all about making gays happy isn’t it?

[originalbuckeye]

Why not? EVERYTHING else, every other combination of people, is a-ok in Kalifornia.

[jmacusa]

Well there's the end of Western Christian civilization for sure. Incestuous homosexual marriage. Good God Almighty.

[Rodamala]

What about cousins?

[hecticskeptic]

Actually, the concept of a future time when debauchery knows no bounds was predicted long ago.....

2 Timothy 3:13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

[Snickering Hound]

[bgill]

When one of them decides to identify as a female then they are no longer legally “brothers” so that throws yet another wrench in it. Slippery slope.

[Arthur McGowan]

And that only begs the next obvious question...

Once upon a time, somebody heard the phrase "begs the question," and liked it, and started using it, and didn't bother to find out what it means. And from that single moron, tens of millions of boobs have picked it up.

[ColdSteelTalon]

The cats out of the bag. Now marriage must have no restraints. A man should be able to marry a dog and woman should be able to marry a donkey.

Now anything goes.

[tflabo]

Yep— I framed the same argument but with a Biblical perspective. If the definition of marriage is changed one way, it can be changed a whole lot of other ways. The Bible is very clear about gay sex and incest. Fools ignore it at their own peril.