Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueunicorn6

The attack on the CIA compound does seem to have been the better planned and more concerted attack than the one on the Non-Consulate property. Was the first attack on the Non-Consulate just a strategy to draw the best operators away from the CIA compound?

It worked. They were told from Tripoli to stand down but Tyrone Woods and five others, the best fighters, went to the Non-Consulate to rescue about six people there while leaving nearly thirty at the CIA compound. More people there, all CIA contractors of one kind or another, and loads more files. And who knows what else.


19 posted on 10/24/2015 12:33:59 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

The facts are that they killed our Ambassador. I think it was payback for killing Qadaffi. The paid killers Hillary hired rammed a bayonet up Qadaffi’s behind when they caught him. I think the enemy returned the favor with Stevens. That’s why all the homosexual stories were initially released about Stevens. If anybody found out about the bayonet attack, they could say it was Moslems getting him for being a homosexual. It wasn’t. It was payback for what Obama and Hillary had done to Qadaffi.

I think the first attack was to kill Stevens as payback.


21 posted on 10/24/2015 2:34:09 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson