No.
The video and abandonment were the act, for the purpose of keeping the "al Qaida is on the run" narrative alive and thus to win the election. That battle was lost in November 2012.
What we want is the motive, and we're almost there, but it must be built carefully. Sid Blumenthal's request to Hillary for us to take out Ghadaffi so that he could cash in for BP is one motive. Zero's desire to destabilize the Arab world and the Middle East for his eschatological purposes is the other. So the big questions all revolve around his approval to supply material aid to an al Qaida affiliate, a statutory enemy of the United States, for the purpose of initiating an illegal war with a profit motive.
That's treason sir, by legal definition. Nor is either the Hildabeast nor Commander Xero exempt from the charge after 1/21/16.
Fine, but unless the motive is easily explained and proven to the average voter, it won’t make much difference.
I didn't see a lot of questioning devoted to developing this line of inquiry.
That's treason sir, by legal definition. Nor is either the Hildabeast nor Commander Xero exempt from the charge after 1/21/16.
Sorry but that's pure banana republic stuff. We don't go after previous administrations in court in this country.
If there's a case to be made it needs to be made now.
“What we want is the motive, and we’re almost there, but it must be built carefully. “
I pray that this “construction” is continuing.
BRAVO! We’re on the same track.