Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
"In my case, I’m a purist. I believe ultimately that there is no justification in law ever for any elective abortion."

I'll go out on a limb here, and suggest Trump may not share your view.

Just guessing, because my Trump speak isn't fluent. He probably goes with a states rights angle.

96 posted on 10/27/2015 10:56:37 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: moehoward

Ultimately, I’m okay with a state’s rights angle, if every state bans all abortions in all cases.

But that’s not where we are. So even though I’m a purist, I don’t mind gobbling up enemy territory along the way.

First, we need a way around Roe, I would prefer if the Court would simply reverse itself. A Human Life Amendment would be difficult, but in some ways, preferable. Placed in the Constitution it would be beyond the reach of the back-robed tyrants or Congress or the Executive.

If strictly-enforced,I could be persuaded to accept the Great Exception cases, as I call them, in the short-rerm.

I’d like to hear some specifics from trump, otherwise his attacks on Carson are scurriilous.


98 posted on 10/27/2015 11:12:57 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson