Posted on 10/31/2015 9:18:31 AM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
“anti-trade”
Lol. They’ve got nothing.
Notice that the tone is one of disgust.
How dare Trump advocate jobs for the working class. How cynical of him, right?
The elitist Left is beyond despicable.
Trump is the only one who gets it.
So wonder that he is so favorably trusted on the economy compared to other candidates.
Bill Clinton was a SLEAZE-BAG from the get-go but he wasn't a bad president.
Hillary would be a bad president because she just doesn't have what it takes, that is, to be a LEADER.
Yep. They think they’re hurting Trump, but they are VERY wrong! Go Trump!
The Left is Anti-American!
I agree with you about Bill Clinton not being a bad President. But Hillary would be more dangerous than Obama!
So, are IT guys considered blue collar now?
The reason that Rubio is targeting IT workers with his H1b visas is precisely because they are NOT blue collar, union workers. They mostly White Middle Class workers.
More lies by the libs.
He is for fair trade.
A good negotiator goes to the table with something he owns or controls that the other side wants.
Every major overseas government wants our money and our goods.
So a negotiator says “We would like to trade with you. So we want you to .....whatever....”.
We have been leaving the door open and letting them trade on their grounds rather on on a basis benefiting both.
The old saying that a good deal is one profitable to both is still correct.
Very few blue collar guys are union now anyway.
Yes, she would.
I think that she's capricious. THAT is her second worst characteristic, the first being her inability to LEAD.
Any such tariffs would be a tax on consumers.
make it harder for China and others to export their goods,
Government needs to get out of the way.
and tear up trade deals
Tearing up our trade deals would be a good thing as long as our government doesn't negotiate a new deals.
Free trade is not FAIR trade in any agreement the US has signed on to so far. Our trading “partners” in the agreements still retain some (or many) barriers to imports from the US.
We have been pushed to accept the “free trade is fair trade” ruse since Bush41.
What Washington calls fair trade is far from fair. We continue to increase our trade imbalance in the name of this mythical fairness.
What is fair or free about the communist Chinese and their 11 year old laborers buying MFN status?
What is fair about NAFTA, encouraging poverty level wages the other side of the border?
Keyston XL should have been a footnote under NAFTA, but NAFTA is not about N/A, the USA, or Canada, it’s about legalized cheap labor in Mexico.
Trade is good. Open trade is awesome. That’s not what we have today.
We fought our revolution, in part, over taxation without representation. Well American representatives are now effectively taxing american business by increasing the cost of business and labor to the point the majority of american products are unexportable.
Through trade policy, labor policy, and all advised trade treaties America is for all intents and purposes self-tarrifing. Anyone that doesn’t realize that trade policy is critical to our survival as a nation is concurrently unaware of the current world economy and ignorant of history.
Free trade is fair trade. Government negotiated trade is not.
Anti-trade...
Like saying you’re against guns because you dissed a mass murderer who used a gun.
What Washington calls "free trade" is not free trade.
Ping
For the most part, big business had been supporting the Democrat party for decades. Small business people aren't being alienated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.