Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It ain't over yet.
1 posted on 10/31/2015 3:22:12 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: McGruff
Aside from her biggest critics looks like no one cares about this..She just needs to be beaten badly in the elections and hopefully that will be enough to send her off into the sunset...hopefully
2 posted on 10/31/2015 3:26:45 PM PDT by SteveinSATX (C'mon Cruz, Trump or Carson ...baby needLos a new pair of shoes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff; All

Read #6 in this interesting email floating around from Rick Wiles:

Dear friend,

I have collected and read many prophetic dreams and visions over the past 17 years of this ministry. One of the oldest visions in my files was received by Reverend William Branham in 1933.

First, let me say that William Branham, who passed away in 1965, was and is a controversial figure. He rose to national prominence in the Post-World War II era. Mr. Branham attracted vast crowds to his traveling revival tent crusades. There were many claims of miraculous healings at his meetings. Some of his doctrines were quite controversial. Even today, he still has ardent friends and foes debating the merits of his national ministry that ended 50 years ago.

For now, however, I want to focus on an amazing prophetic vision Rev. Branham received in 1933. There is ample evidence that he spoke and wrote often about it. Therefore, it is not an “internet folk legend.” He often mentioned the vision in his sermons throughout decades of preaching.

I have mentioned it various times since I first went on the radio in 1999. Many people believe Hillary Clinton will win both the Democratic Party nomination and the general election in 2016. I thought this is a good time to revisit Rev. Branham’s 1933 vision.

I’m not going to publish his words in full. There are various websites and books with accurate quotes. Instead, I will capsulize what he saw in 1933.

First, take a moment to think about the age. The Great Depression started in late 1929. A fourth of the American people were unemployed. New York Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt won the presidency in a landslide victory in November 1932. The communists had seized control of Russia and changed the country’s name to the Soviet Union. Benito Mussolini and his Fascist Political Party was in control of Italy. Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist Party seized power in Germany. The Japanese Empire was becoming militarily militant. The world was still recovering from the First World War.

Rev. Branham received the vision on a Sunday morning as he was preparing his sermon. He said that God showed him seven things that would happen:

1. The Italian Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini would invade Ethiopia. He will later come to a shameful demise and suffer a horrible death. His people would spit on him.

2. Adolf Hitler would start the Second World War. America would be drawn into the war. Hitler would come to a “mysterious end.” Rev. Branham was shown the Siegfried line where there would be a great loss of American lives.

3. Three “isms” would spread across the world. Fascism, Nazism, and Communism. The voice in the vision told him to “Watch Russia, she will become a great world power.”

4. After the Second World War, technology and science would advance rapidly. People would ride in driver-less egg-shaped cars with bubble roofs and no steering wheels. The passengers would be amused by games while riding in the driver-less vehicles.

5. America’s morality would decline significantly and rapidly. Moreover, women would begin wearing skimpy clothing, and would adopt the clothing of men. In the vision, he saw a woman who was all but naked as she clothed herself with a tiny apron the size of a fig leaf. The moral degradation of women permitted sexual perversion to flourish.

6. A cruel woman will seize power in the United States. She possessed a hardness that defied description. She was cruel, wicked, and cunning. She dominated the United States with authority, and she had complete power over the population. The voice did not tell him the identity of the wicked woman. He wasn’t sure if it would be an actual human being or a spiritual entity.

7. The voice in the vision told him to look again at America after the cruel woman seized power. He saw great explosions rip the country to pieces. He saw America turned into a land of smoking ruins. As far as his eye could see there was nothing remaining except smoldering piles of debris and craters. He saw no human life.

I don’t know if Hillary Clinton will be the fulfillment of the Sixth scene in William Branham’s 1933 vision. If she is that person, the last scene won’t be far behind her. God have mercy on us.

There is one thing, however, that I am certain. No other U.S. presidential candidate has ever been photographed wearing a witch’s costume!


3 posted on 10/31/2015 3:29:22 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

Is it too obvious a thing for people to grasp that if the FBI is still having an issue with her emails, then Gowdy failed horribly in his so called attempt to get to the truth?

Should not Gowdy have been hand in hand with the FBI?

Is it not painfully obvious Gowdy did the GOP bidding and allowed the Dems to turn this into a circus so it would ‘fade’?


4 posted on 10/31/2015 3:31:11 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (Embrace "Existential Cage Theory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff
Embassy Tripoli on 9/14: "Relatively few have even mentioned the inflammatory video. So if we post messaging about the video specifically, we may draw unwanted attention to it."

Did State WANT to inflame the area? Why didn't State listen? Why did they do exactly the opposite of what had been recommended. Oh yes, that's right, the election.

6 posted on 10/31/2015 3:31:38 PM PDT by LZ_Bayonet ( I AM THE TEA PARTY LEADER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

The inquiry might fade but it doesn’t fade in the minds of the relatives and the rest of the US minus of course the MSM. They’re more interested in a loose pumpkin balloon.


8 posted on 10/31/2015 3:37:38 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

“The FBI’s Counterintelligence Division, ... is under pressure to act quickly,”

Skip the full service wash, boys ... this time just the Express whitewash!
Wham bam—thank you Ma’am! May we have another? The Effa Bee Eye


14 posted on 10/31/2015 4:27:24 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

The existence of the emails is unimportant.

Their content is potentially very important, for evidence of bribery and tax evasion.


15 posted on 10/31/2015 4:30:04 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

18 posted on 10/31/2015 4:44:58 PM PDT by Libloather (Embrace the suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

The thing I don’t understand in all of this is why is she not behind bars already? If it were you or I, we won’t have a say in it...

Just because she is a Clinton and the head of the most evil of Crime families, she walks?

This is totally disgusting, and now she thinks that America owes her the throne? Well I’ll buy her a ‘throne’ but it won’t be the kind she’s talking about...it will be on the wall behind bars where she belongs!!!


19 posted on 10/31/2015 4:45:06 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 (I have such happy days, and hope you do too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff
FBI: "Madam Secretary, did you mishandle classified emails?"

HRC: "No, I did not."

FBI: "I guess we can wrap up the investigation. Nothing to see here."

20 posted on 10/31/2015 4:55:26 PM PDT by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

He was wrong about the aprons, so I’m not sure about the rest.


24 posted on 10/31/2015 5:39:27 PM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term governors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff
Peter Zeidenberg, a former federal prosecutor who handles cases against local, state and federal officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, Scooter Libby, for leaking the covert identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame, said Clinton’s actions may have been foolish but not necessarily illegal.

“If the emails were not marked, it would not be possible – at least not in my view – to establish that Ms. Clinton knowingly mishandled classified information,” he said. “How was she to know that this was classified if it was not marked?”

Whether they were marked classified or not, or if she knowingly mishandled classified information is not the standard. 18 USC 793 subsection F, does not require information to be classified in order to amount to a violation. Also intent is not the standard, it is gross negligence. From 793:

through gross negligence permits the same ( any document related to the national defense of the US ) to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed,

Just setting up the email server is a violation of this. The documents don't have to be classified. Just an email between her and a head of state would relate to the national defense ). Also there were emails that contained satellite images. Such an email does not have to be marked classified in order to determine if it contained classified info. Her aids were taking classified docs, then cutting and pasting them into a new document and sending that one out. Whether marked classified or not, hey contained info relating to the national defense.

25 posted on 10/31/2015 8:31:20 PM PDT by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

A carnaval show for the masses, the line is long and NO ONE has been held responsible for anything and the GOP hearings make them look stupid and balless


26 posted on 11/01/2015 4:07:00 AM PST by ronnie raygun (better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson