Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WTFOVR
Not all of the judges agreed on the ruling. In a dissent, Judge Eugene Fahey wrote, “I cannot join in a result that analyzes our statutes to determine that a six-day-old child is not a person.”

I say that those judges who made this ruling are not human beings.

8 posted on 10/31/2015 4:32:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
Sick ain't it.

D Rider makes the essential point at Post #14.

Control the definition of a human being, or a worthwhile human being, and you are a long way down the road toward commencing The Final Solution.

23 posted on 10/31/2015 5:00:51 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

Likewise, if they want to play that game... they’ve made a mockery of the whole concept of law, so they cannot rightly claim its protection.


31 posted on 10/31/2015 5:15:58 PM PDT by Another Post-American (Jesus died for your sins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

The article didn’t mention the names of the judges who made this outrageous ruling - they should be removed. There are too judges who set themselves up as dictators.


33 posted on 10/31/2015 5:21:29 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson