You did not refute a single evidentiary item I posted. Not McConnell’s biographer revealing to the Weekly Standard that McConnell did not want Bevin to win against Conway; not the litany of comments and claims by GOP leaders in the area that they were supporting Conway; not a single refutation of the ads Conway ran that were nearly word-for-word what McConnell’s ads were.
Such as you are revealed, I have no time or patience to argue with GOP Ruling Class Apologists and party hacks.
Keep carrying Mitch’s water. You are doing a bang-up job.
LOL, yes, that’s the nonsense you always fall back on - “carrying Mitch’s water” “apologist for the ruling class” etc. when mere facts are stating in the refute of inaccuracies. What you stated was 100% refuted and what I stated was 100% verifiable fact. That’s your problem - not whether or not Mitch McConnell is of any count. Mitch McConnell being the scum of the earth or being a greatest thing since sliced bread is completely irrelevant - but is the argument you cling to when you flail your arms in the air to rebel against facts - obviously, if someone cares about accuracy, they must be involved in some sort of McConnell / establishment conspiracy. Amusingly, in order for what you are saying to be accurate, you’d have to say that Matt Bevin is a liar and is lying to make McConnell look good - now what would be the point in him doing that to someone who was actually trying to sabotage him?
I see you also don’t bother to explain your prior comments as to how you both saw no McConnell signs anywhere and also saw where Conway signs were where the McConnell signs were before - there both were, and were not, McConnell signs at the same time. How do you explain that?