Posted on 11/04/2015 4:36:31 AM PST by Kaslin
Mean girls.
The last three words of this sentence is a perfect description for each of The View's participants.
it is pertinent to remember that Whoopi is not white
Agreed.
I don’t watch television at all except for for NFL games, but the entire premise of “The View” is enough to put you off your lunch.
Let’s get a bunch of unattractive, shrewish, liberal women to sit at a table while they play to the camera, drink coffee, gossip, and tell everyone what they think about everything.
Um...let’s not.
True feminine heroine Michelle Malkin has the Shrews of the View For Breakfast .... ping ....
Years ago it was a good show and was a favorite at my favorite watering hole. Then it changed and we started calling it âThe wicked witchesâ. It was no longer shown at the bar.
If anything, this episode is mean girls, bullying...each deserve a pimp slap from Carly...what they get will be a polite handshake and reasoned responses.
Im not too confident that works any more.
If I was a butt-ugly black woman, a fat loudmouth white woman, a dried up, demented old woman, or a black woman who abuses Clorox, I don’t think I would criticize another woman’s looks.
“I donât think I would criticize another womanâs looks”
I am sure they are sorry...
and will now give Glowing comments about—
HITLERY’S looks-
left wing whores- todays TV shows are filled with crap-
glad I am Cable free- 3 years now- will NEVER turn back
That would be akin to torture for me.
The View was set up as a sop to the abhorrent Barbara Walters when news audiences could no longer stomach her, and rich white executives feared her lispy anger. The View became a soapbox for loony feminist nonsense from predictable guests, airing after Oprah in many markets.
The network should kill this show with fire, and do penance by airing classroom video from Hillsdale college.
Wouldn't it be great if Fiorina showed up with Michelle Malkin or Ann Coulter in tow? "Hi, everybody, I brought a friend. Is that okay?"
They could all have snark for breakfast. Their own.
Yeah, I've been thinking the same thing:
These six [things] doth the Lord hate: yea, seven [are] an abomination unto him:Seven out of seven. A 'perfect' score.
A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
A heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
A false witness [that] speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
--Proverbs 6:16-19
Good luck with that!
BTTT
The View was set up as a sop to the abhorrent Barbara Walters...
The writer's premise is wrong.
I happened to catch out of one eye, while packing some luggage on a trip eighteen years ago, a CSPAN post-talk Q&A with a female executive of The Ladies Home Journal. The general subject was women in entertainment. A young representative of the Democrat Party's core cadre of young, overeducated "cause women" rose to ask the Journal's senior exec why there weren't more shows geared to women's interests.
The exec's reply was both forceful and exasperated. She began by asking the younger woman whether she had been paying attention, and what universe did she live in (it was quite a spanky), in which women were underserved somehow by TV?
Every program outside the sports ghetto is female-dominated, the executive went on to explain. Women's interests are shown clearly by the advertisers TV programming attracts, and the programming in turn reflects a strong awareness of female enthusiasms and wants. Why, the executive asked, have men become a race of channel-surfers, constantly flicking through the dial in a ceaseless search for something that interests them? She concluded that her premise was correct, and TV programming is strongly gynecocentric to the point of total exclusion of male interests.
With her comments in mind since then, I've noticed how even the overnight news is loaded up with female-oriented advertising and pseudo-news ("ET" stuff, Hollywood fluff, mirror-gazing "studies", etc.), all of which caters for what I personally think is a tendency toward mass solipsism, if that isn't an oxymoron, in their favored female demographic.
The advertising and pseudo-news has a formula they follow, which I have reduced to bullet points as follows:
Every topic on TV centers around a few basic thematic images:
- Women talking (called "2CK" by Mad Avenue cynics for three generations now)
- A doctor talking to a woman
- Children or babies, and a woman with or without doctor
- Products for women, frequently gynecological
This breakdown works for the evening news almost as well, although the presence of young male popinjays is acknowledged as well ("I got this"), since they are almost as engagingly merchantable as women in general.
Soft news, soft heads, soft country.
That trash is still on?
Amazingly profound recitation of Hillary Clinton's campaign
The biggest haters of women are today’s feminists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.