Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyLady27
Yes it does...but Trump can’t do that can he? He’s a business man so he’s going to use it, the same as the Federal Government does, the same as the State Government does; the same as the City Government does, so if it needs to be ‘reformed’ WE need to go to our House Representatives, who make the laws of America ( or used to ) and have them change it!

You just don't get it, do you. The Constitution says that eminent domain may only be used for a PUBLIC use. So, when the Federal Government, or State Government, or City Government uses it, that is a Constitutional use of the power.

When, however, Donald Trump uses it--for instance, to force someone out of their house so he can expand his parking lot--that is a PRIVATE use, and is thus unconstitutional.

And Trump supports that. Because he doesn't want to be constrained by the Constitution. But that's fine with some of you, I guess...

55 posted on 11/05/2015 10:37:33 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

Donald Trump, a private citizen, could not seize anyone’s property. The government was the entity who invoked eminent domain, not Donald Trump. The Your outrage should be directed at the people actually responsible; the people who said yes instead of no.


157 posted on 11/05/2015 11:35:58 AM PST by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson