Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus

> the Supreme Court of the United States refused to overrule

Barnett, Keyes et. al. v Obama, et. al. was one of many cases denied certiorari without explanation. http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/061112zor.pdf

Denied certiorari is not the same as “affirmed”


287 posted on 11/16/2015 1:08:22 PM PST by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

You are correct. It takes the concurrence of four of the nine Justices to “grant cert” (allow an appeal to proceed to oral arguments). There were not four Justices who wanted to grant cert to Barnett v Obama therefore the lower court’s ruling which dismissed the lawsuit stands.
Judge Carter dismissed the suit. He denied a motion for reconsideration. He denied a motion to transfer the case. He denied a second motion for reconsideration.
The plaintiffs then appealed to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals who affirmed the lower court’s dismissal. The plaintiffs’ motion for rehearing was denied. A request for an emergency Writ of Mandamus to allow inspection of Obama’s original birth certificate was denied. A second request for a rehearing was denied. A request for a rehearing “en banc” ( by the full court rather than a three judge panel) was denied.
The plaintiffs then appealed to SCOTUS where the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari was denied.


298 posted on 11/16/2015 3:27:37 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson