[editor-surveyor]

.
The law was signed by the president.

Its provisions were not complied with by same president, thus the ‘deal’ is not a deal, and any compliance with the provisions thereof is unlawful.

.
>> Where? <<

At least 1000 times right here on this forum. You’re obviously deliberately ignoring it. Trolling is what it is called.
.

[papertyger]

The law was signed by the president. Its provisions were not complied with by same president, thus the ‘deal’ is not a deal, and any compliance with the provisions thereof is unlawful.

Why are you dodging the question? How does the Corker amendment aid a future President by the Senate ceding its prerogative to the Executive?

At least 1000 times right here on this forum.

Then coughing up one sourced citation shouldn't be a problem. Why are you stalling?