Trump wants to look at these issues carefully with his advisers before giving a detailed answer, or even a firm yes or no. I think that’s a good quality in a presidential candidate.
If he’s president, of course he’ll have to have a full answer ready on everything, and the closer he can get to that during the campaign, the better for us. He has to formulate enough thorough and solid plans for us to trust him on what still remains when he is president.
He’s already getting rebuttals from de Blasio for something he didn’t even say in the middle of signing books. Anybody think it DOESN’T bear serious looking-into, which is what he said?
Trump prides himself as being inpredictable on negotiations. That’s how he wins. You can see him playing his cards very close to the vest when he skates in answering a question. Furthermore, he knows the other candidates are copying his position on some issues.
It seems to me that the only one that is being held to this standard of having to give a definitive answer, on everything, is Trump. Only when he started giving out more detailed plans on issues, did everyone else.
I realize the article and thread isn’t about Rubio, but I can’t help but comment on the fact that he isn’t ever asked anything requiring details. More importantly, he lies through his teeth about immigration and never gets called out on it.
-— Trump wants to look at these issues carefully with his advisers before giving a detailed answer, or even a firm yes or no. I think that’s a good quality in a presidential candidate. -—
It could also mean that he s evasive or has no answer.
Trump has said many times that he like to be "unpredictable"
Hence his answer..."we will look at that"
without giving specifics.
Well then his advisers should be running for President. At least then the candidate would have a definable view.