[Finny]

Perhaps. As well, you don't spend 21 of the past 26 years donating more to Democrats than to Republicans, switch parties THREE times and only in the past five years start donating exclusively to Republicans and help advance functional Democrats like Mitt Romney and McCain (Then-Democrat Trump endorsed McCain in 2008, some say because Obama didn't run Hillary as his running mate, a suggestion Trump avoided denying when it was suggested), because you're "conservative."

You can vote for that at your own risk. I'll stick with Cruz.

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

Perhaps. As well, you don't spend 21 of the past 26 years donating more to Democrats than to Republicans

Not much more. Trump donated maybe 560,000 to Dems over that period, maybe 460 or 490 to Republicans, if memory serves. After that, Trump donated exclusively to Republicans.

You can vote for that at your own risk. I'll stick with Cruz.

Have fun with Mr. Amnesty/TPP/CFR goon.

[ripnbang]

You can vote for that at your own risk. I’ll stick with Cruz.
===============•••=======•===============================
So, let’s examine that logic....we have before us a candidate that has been in business in liberal NYC and has been all across the board in party affiliation, but who is now running as a Republican, funding their own campaign, beholden to no one, kicking a*s and taking names, and is now advocating a position on illegal immigration that we’ve been waiting for (wall, deportation, etc) vs. a career politician who previously supported a wall and deportation, but now, being funded by specious PACs takes a position of having a “conversation” and “nothing is off the table” (re: amnesty), and you’ll go with the latter.......