“I’ve heard all the “electable†stuff before. Last time was in 2012.”
About when you signed up?
I don’t care about “electable”. I care about actually winning.
No win. No change.
That is a separate issue from winning and then having the big picture vision for what must change and having the stones to do it.
Cruz is exactly what trump needs in a partner. They each have strengths.
No. I signed up in 2011 after lurking for three years.
But if you suspect troll, I invite you to go through my posting history and see if you can find something. You won't. Like I said, I've supported the Constitutional conservative from the beginning.
"I don’t care about “electableâ€. I care about actually winning."
You said you want someone who can win. By definition, that's electable.
"No win. No change."
No Constitutional conservative, no good result.
I'm not interested in some kind of strongman savior. This is a Constitutional republic, and we need to get back to those founding principles or we're lost.
"That is a separate issue from winning and then having the big picture vision for what must change and having the stones to do it."
In other words, a strongman savior who can somehow do magic by his will or the force of his personality.
Yeah. I'm not buying.
"Cruz is exactly what trump needs in a partner. They each have strengths."
Cruz isn't going to tie himself to Trump; it would be too damaging.
Ted's in it to win.