Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump: Actually, I May Break My Pledge Not To Go Third Party
Townhall.com ^ | November 23, 2015 | Guy Benson

Posted on 11/23/2015 7:58:08 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-248 next last
To: Hostage

“You joined the red herring of Trump splitting the vote as Perot did in 92. You’re not bullshitting anyone”.

This is what I said:

“Perot got Clinton elected. “Read my lips” didn’t have that much influence”.

Now you tell me how what I said has anything to do with Trump or even implies anything about Trump. You’re mixed up.

Apology accepted.


101 posted on 11/23/2015 8:53:47 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: laplata
Perot got Clinton elected. "Read my lips" didn't have that much influence.

BS! HWB was compassionate conservative, thousand points of light disaster and in no way had the leadership needed to continue Reagan's vision for America. That is why he lost.

102 posted on 11/23/2015 8:54:12 PM PST by JoSixChip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: detch
Perot cut a deal with Clinton to win the contract for Hillary Care before he even ran. The deal didn't pan out when Hillary Care crashed and burned, and Perot disappeared.

No sign of Trump making a similar deal.

103 posted on 11/23/2015 8:54:14 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Perot trumpeted his engineering skills the way
The Donald does his business skills. Remember,
Perot created Electronic Data Systems, which
he sold to GM, and was worth billions of dollars.

Perot glossed over the deeper analysis of America’s
problems at the time by saying things like, “We’ll
lift up the hood and poke around in there and see
what needs to be done.” Dana Carvey nailed Perot’s
idiosyncrasies on Saturday Night Live. Perot’s
main thing was fighting NAFTA, which was that
“giant sucking sound” down south.

Where Trump has charisma, Perot was just ... odd. But
he wasn’t that smarmy SOB Bush.


104 posted on 11/23/2015 8:55:23 PM PST by sparklite2 (Islam = all bathwater, no baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Votes to Perot got Clinton elected and that’s a fact.


105 posted on 11/23/2015 8:56:17 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Do you suppose if they really DO try to do him in (and, God forbid, succeed), that would finally be the “go code” for a mass rebellion?


106 posted on 11/23/2015 8:56:34 PM PST by hoagy62 (Timid Men prefer the 'Calm of Despotism' to the 'Tempestuous Sea of Liberty'. ~ T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

IN my opinion, I think Trump should stay the course, and make the GOPe do whatever it needs to think they can do...

They didn’t make Trump and they can’t take Trump out, only Trump can take Trump out...(Rush Limbaugh)

So with that being said, let the rest of these candidates, governors, politicians and others make a fool of themselves and let the American People see that they are not on the side for a better America...make the GOPe and the rest go to 3rd party and support Trump on the Republican Ticket and take it all on a landslide election to the White House....


107 posted on 11/23/2015 8:56:53 PM PST by HarleyLady27 (I have such happy days, I hope you do too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

I agree. Blaming Perot for Bush being a dud is the GOP establishment line. Bush blew that election through his own actions.


108 posted on 11/23/2015 8:57:06 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: UnChained
It looks to me like Perot split the vote after all.

No, bush split the vote because he did not stand for conservative values. He campaigned on the same uni party platform clinton did. Why vote for a panderer when you can have the real thing?
109 posted on 11/23/2015 8:58:01 PM PST by JoSixChip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

You maybe right on that one. I certainly hope so.
Regardless, the GOPe is going to be a rump party after 2016.
I also have not forgotten Mississippi.


110 posted on 11/23/2015 8:58:44 PM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: detch

Did the GOP run ads against Perot during the primaries? Was Perot the front runner at any time during that election?

Pray America wakes


111 posted on 11/23/2015 8:58:56 PM PST by bray (Trump/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
I suspect Mister Trump is doing what he can to mess w GOP candidates, and then whine about "unfair treatment" and go third party, indy, in order to siphon votes away from the GOP nom and hand the election to his long-time pal, Hillary.

The term lily-livered comes to mind when I read your posts. If you want to change the status-quo you are going to have to man-up.
112 posted on 11/23/2015 9:01:28 PM PST by JoSixChip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: laplata

You’re a bit dense aren’t you?

What’s this thread about?

It’s about Donald Trump possibly going 3rd party.

What are you carrying on about? About fricking Perot. Why would you be doing that? To imply Trump will lose like Perot. But your implication sucks because Perot and Trump are not comparable.


113 posted on 11/23/2015 9:02:59 PM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
Nope, the Dems would win the election after each of the other two parties voting base is cut in half.

Yep, and it will be the last election conservatives have a chance of getting someone even slightly rational into the White House. The future down the road means Yeb's all the way.

Which is why we should tell the RNC to STOP attacking candidates and go after the Democrats. I think Trump would hold his pledge if it was fair... even if Yeb moved on.

114 posted on 11/23/2015 9:03:42 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

No one gives a flying f*ck about Perot. Perot is not relevant. He’s nowhere near as charismatic or as attractive as Donald Trump. Period; End of Story.


115 posted on 11/23/2015 9:04:35 PM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: econjack

The site tells us who Guy Benson is, Townhall.com’s Political Editor.


116 posted on 11/23/2015 9:05:04 PM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
Fair enough, but if Perot had not run in 92, Clinton would not have won.

The bush's destroyed the conservative brand. The only reason w^3 was elected is because clintion was a scumbag. This country was designed to be run by citizen leaders, not politicians.
117 posted on 11/23/2015 9:05:17 PM PST by JoSixChip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

I really think they are hellbent on getting Hillary into the White house at all costs, that’s how backstabbing the GOP has become now. They damn well know there is not a chance in hell Jeb or Rubio can beat Hillary, it’s all a set up. And if they can’t get Trump to drop out, they’re going to force him into a 3rd party run as a last resort to try to pull a Ross Perot which they believe will again get Hillary elected. But you know what? I think even if Trump goes 3rd party, he will STILL win. Just wait till he debates this effin bitch, he will flatten her and any other token RINO the GOP wants to prop up. People are sick to death of TREASON.


118 posted on 11/23/2015 9:05:17 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 20 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think this is merely the author trying to stir up some excrement because Trump is doing too good.


119 posted on 11/23/2015 9:05:28 PM PST by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

“Votes to Perot got Clinton elected and that’s a fact.”

It’s also a fact that Bush didn’t have some kind of divine right to the vote of someone who is turned off by him.
No new taxes. And still other that things like condoms on the Christmas tree and other window dressing, Clinton was basically Bush. There were no huge policy differences. That’s why they are such close friends today.

They won’t get a vote by being the lesser of two evils anymore. It appears the GOP learned nothing from Perot and is acting exactly the same. They deserve a repeat if they manage to foist a Kasich or Bush or Rubio on us.


120 posted on 11/23/2015 9:06:37 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson