“You joined the red herring of Trump splitting the vote as Perot did in 92. You’re not bullshitting anyone”.
This is what I said:
“Perot got Clinton elected. “Read my lips†didn’t have that much influence”.
Now you tell me how what I said has anything to do with Trump or even implies anything about Trump. You’re mixed up.
Apology accepted.
You’re a bit dense aren’t you?
What’s this thread about?
It’s about Donald Trump possibly going 3rd party.
What are you carrying on about? About fricking Perot. Why would you be doing that? To imply Trump will lose like Perot. But your implication sucks because Perot and Trump are not comparable.