Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vintage Boeing B-52 gets new long-range Lockheed cruise missile
Flightglobal.com ^ | 23 NOVEMBER, 2015 | JAMES DREW

Posted on 11/23/2015 9:28:29 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki

The Boeing B-52H is the vintage bomber that just won’t quit, and now the Cold War-era “Stratofortress” is being outfitted with one of America’s newest and longest-range conventional cruise missiles.

Lockheed Martin has been put on contract to arm the 54-year-old aircraft – which has outlived many of those who predicted its retirement – with the extended-range Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Weapon (JASSM) under a $9.1 million contract announced earlier this month.

In a statement to Flightglobal, LM director of long-range strike systems Jason Denney confirms that the B-52 will be updated to carry the turbofan engine-powered cruise missile internally on a new digitised rotary launcher and externally on its pylons.

The bomber has long carried conventional cruise missiles, namely the non-nuclear derivative of the AGM-86 “ALCM” that has an unclassified range of 600nm and is being retired as supplies run low.

Boeing B-52s can carry up to 20 nuclear-armed Air-Launched Cruise Missiles (ALCMs) and by 2018 will probably be carrying a similar number of smarter, non-nuclear Lockheed Martin JASSM-ERs.

US Air Force

Already equipped to carry the shorter-range baseline JASSM missile on its pylons, adding the extended range variant more than doubles the bomber’s JASSM strike distance to 500nm (926km). That allows lumbering, non-stealthy B-52H to punch out targets while keeping clear of hazardous air defence systems well into the future.

According to Lockheed, the B-52 has only fired the JASSM-ER during operational testing off its external pylons, and the bomber now joins the Lockheed F-16 and soon the Boeing F-15E on the integration to-do list. B-52 integration will wrap up in 2018, as will the project to arm the F-16.

“F-15E integration will be next in line,” says Denney. “The expansion of the JASSM-ER employment aircraft set will significantly enhance the US warfighter’s first-day, first-strike capabilities.”

The baseline JASSM missile has been in serial production for over a decade but production recently switched to the new double-range JASSM-ER (500nm unclassified).

Lockheed Martin

The beefing up of Stratofortress weaponry for conventional warfighting comes as the air force removes nuclear weapons from dozens of B-52s previously assigned to the strategic deterrence mission to achieve compliance with new strategic arms limitations agreed with Russia.

The air force currently plans to retire the supersonic Boeing/Rockwell B-1B and the B-52H in the 1940s as their Long-Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B) replacement steps in.

JASSM-ER takes advantage of several concurrent digital upgrades that will allow every B-52 to carry smart weapons internally for the first time and on its pylons. The Boeing-led Combat Network Communications Technology improvement will further allow B-52s to update their missions plans via satellite and retarget weapons in flight – as most other combat aircraft have been doing for decades.

The B-52's rotary launcher, seen here carrying up to eight ALCM cruise missiles, is being upgraded to carry fully digital smart weapons and decoys.

US Air Force


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; b52; boeing; jassm; jassmer; lockheedmartin; stratofortress; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2015 9:28:30 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Go BUFF!


2 posted on 11/23/2015 9:31:23 PM PST by 867V309 (Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

Nice to see engineering coming back into vogue.


3 posted on 11/23/2015 9:35:10 PM PST by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The B-52 is an engineering masterpiece.
4 posted on 11/23/2015 9:37:32 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I grew up near the AFB in Amarillo and loved
driving by the base and seeing the Buffs with
their high tails. My ex-BIL went to the AF
academy and ended up being a B-52 pilot.


5 posted on 11/23/2015 9:40:45 PM PST by sparklite2 (Islam = all bathwater, no baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
The B-52 is an engineering masterpiece.

I don't know nuthin' but this looks like a tremendous launch platform that greatly extends the range of ordnance and reduces time to target.


6 posted on 11/23/2015 9:42:37 PM PST by 867V309 (Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The air force currently plans to retire the supersonic Boeing/Rockwell B-1B and the B-52H in the 1940s

1940's you say?

7 posted on 11/23/2015 9:42:38 PM PST by HonkyTonkMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“The air force currently plans to retire the supersonic Boeing/Rockwell B-1B and the B-52H in the 1940s as their Long-Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B) replacement steps in.”

I hear that B-29 is really gonna be something!


8 posted on 11/23/2015 9:44:00 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HonkyTonkMan

Heh, Good catch. Guess we’re back to B-17’s


9 posted on 11/23/2015 9:44:16 PM PST by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002

Hey, we still fly a b17 and I have been involved with the same bird for almost 25 years.She still looks great and me,well not so much.


10 posted on 11/23/2015 9:48:38 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A $9 million contract? That won’t even pay for the feasibility studies. $900 million I would believe.


11 posted on 11/23/2015 9:48:45 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
The bomber has long carried conventional cruise missiles, namely the non-nuclear derivative of the AGM-86 “ALCM” that has an unclassified range of 600nm and is being retired as supplies run low...

Putin would be retiring these right into ISIS positions. And running the supplies low in the process.

12 posted on 11/23/2015 9:56:06 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Of course, the difference between accomodating conventional and and nuke warheads is likely not much more that electronic wiring arrangements for PAL links. I doubt the warhead hardware hardpoints are drastically different. We have had dual warhead cruise missiles for decades.


13 posted on 11/23/2015 9:57:00 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
A $9 million contract? That won’t even pay for the feasibility studies.

Good catch! $9 million wouldn't buy the congressmen to approve the appropriation.


14 posted on 11/23/2015 9:57:00 PM PST by 867V309 (Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

The B-52 is an engineering masterpiece.


Yes it is. And it’s still a big ugly beautiful old bird.


15 posted on 11/23/2015 10:03:36 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

Hey, we still fly a b17 and I have been involved with the same bird for almost 25 years


That’s awesome! You’re to be commended.


16 posted on 11/23/2015 10:05:49 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

LOL...I like your comparison. Maybe the $9 M would initially buy him, but wouldn’t keep him bought.


17 posted on 11/23/2015 10:07:19 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
LOL...I like your comparison. Maybe the $9 M would initially buy him, but wouldn’t keep him bought.

Maybe if you threw in a hooker...


18 posted on 11/23/2015 10:12:40 PM PST by 867V309 (Trump: Bull in a RINO Shoppe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

Or a couple young boys...


19 posted on 11/23/2015 10:16:48 PM PST by null and void (We are AmeriCANs. We CAN learn, and learn from history, if we choose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: laplata

It helps that we are all just a little crazy.


20 posted on 11/23/2015 10:24:23 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson